1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02577733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of medium-grain dataflow code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, token-based approaches [Arvind and Nikhil 1990;Ottenstein et al 1990;Najjar et al 1994] require checking the presence of the necessary tokens on incoming edges. This means that either: (1) a scanner must periodically check the schedulability of data-flow threads, or (2) data-flow threads are suspendable.…”
Section: Feed-forward Data-flow Model and Interfacementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, token-based approaches [Arvind and Nikhil 1990;Ottenstein et al 1990;Najjar et al 1994] require checking the presence of the necessary tokens on incoming edges. This means that either: (1) a scanner must periodically check the schedulability of data-flow threads, or (2) data-flow threads are suspendable.…”
Section: Feed-forward Data-flow Model and Interfacementioning
confidence: 96%