An evaluation of MoReq2 in the context of national EDRMS standard developments in the UK and Europe

Wilhelm, Philipp

doi:10.1108/09565690910972075

Cited by 13 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They also help to integrate different data sources by treating them as a singular totality. [28] There are studies in the literature where ERMSs are compared employing hermeneutics method [21], [23], [24].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

An Evaluation of TS13298 in the Scope of MoReq2

Alır

Sødring

Soydal

2010

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

TS13298 is the first Turkish standard developed for electronic records management. It was published in 2007 and is particularly important when developing e-government services. MoReq2, which was published in 2008 as an initiative of the European Union countries, is an international "de facto" standard within the field of electronic records management. This paper compares and evaluates the content and presentation of the TS13298 and MoReq2 standards, and similarities and differences between the two standards are described. Moreover, the question of how MoReq2 can be used as a reference when updating TS13298 is also dealt with. The method of hermeneutics is used for the evaluation, and the texts of TS13298 and MoReq2 were compared and reviewed. These texts were evaluated in terms of terminology, access control and security, retention and disposition, capture and declaring, search, retrieval, presentation and metadata scheme. We discovered that TS13298 and MoReq2 have some "requirements" in common. However, the MoReq2 requirements, particularly in terms of control and security, retention and disposition, capture and declaration, search and presentation, are both vaster and more detailed than those of TS13298. As a conclusion it is emphasized that it would be convenient to update TS13298 by considering these requirements. Moreover, it would be useful to update and improve TS13298 by evaluating MoReq2 in terms of terminology and metadata scheme.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Wilhelm [23] has also evaluated the interviews for the comparison of MoReq2 and TNA 2002. He pointed out that the most significant problem concerning the implementation of MoReq2 is that it is a highly detailed and long text.…”

Section: Model Requirements For the Management Of Electronic Records (Moreq2)mentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evaluation of TS13298 in the Scope of MoReq2

Alır

Sødring

Soydal

2010

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Over the last two decades there have been numerous eff orts around the world to develop standards and best practice guidelines to manage records (Healy, 2010;McLeod & Hare, 2010;Pember, 2006;Wilhelm, 2009). The standards and best practice guidelines cover the whole spectrum of challenges for records professionals, but for the purpose of this discussion the only ones highlighted are those directly connected to ECM implementation.…”

Section: Standards and Best Practice Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Commentators argued that the standard was a great contribution to the profession but also urged further development to keep up with technological trends (Cain, 2002). This saw the publishing of MoReq2 in 2008(European Commission, 2008 generating discussions about how the standard could be applied in various EU countries such as the UK (Wilhelm, 2009) and Finland (Henttonen, 2009). Further developments on the standards have seen the publishing of the latest iteration known as MoReq2010 (DLM Forum Foundation, 2011).…”

Section: European Unionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enterprise Content Management Implementation: An Overview of Phases, Standards and Best Practice Guidelines

Katuu

2012

Bilgi Dünyası

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The management of digital records has been a subject of numerous scholarly discussions for several years. Discussions on the application systems used to manage these records and other digital content have often used diff erent terminology, frequently interchangeably, with little regard to nuanced diff erences. In addition, a number of standards and best practice guidelines have been developed in diff erent countries to address the challenges of assessing and implementing these applications. While it may look like a lot of resources are available to records professionals as they tackle the challenges of implementing software applications, there is need to clarify terminology and identify implementation phases, as well, as the appropriate standards and best practice guidelines. This article, using primarily a review of literature, suggests definitional clarity and connectedness of diff erent terms used for Enterprise Content Management (ECM) applications. It identifies the various phases of implementation of ECM applications and off ers an overview of standards and best practice guidelines. Lastly it provides an assessment of the connection between phases of implementation in relation to standards and best practice guidelines, providing a gap analysis while also suggesting ways of addressing the variance.

show abstract

“…The second is DoD 5015.2 (2002) the US defence standard on design criteria for electronic records management software applications, developed for and by the military sector, as a model for testing ERMS software products. MoReq has been the subject of articles published in RMJ (Wilhelm, 2009;Henttonen, 2009;Cain, 2002).…”

Section: Concepts and Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of RMJ

McLeod

Hare²

2010

Records Management Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine critically the history of Records Management Journal on its 20th anniversary; it aims to review and analyse its evolution and its contribution in the context of the development of the profession and the discipline of records management. The paper seeks to provide the context and justification for the selection of eight articles previously published in the journal to be reprinted in this issue. Design/methodology/approach -The paper utilises the contents of Records Management Journal (1989 to date) to present a thematic analysis of topics covered and their development over time, and statistical data (from 2002 to date) provided by the current publisher to assess quantitatively the use and impact of the journal worldwide. The paper then compares this with a series of key turning points in the records management profession. Findings -There is evidence that the initial aspiration for the journal to make an important and long-lasting impact on the field of records management in the UK has been exceeded because its readers and contributors are global. The volume of downloads has continued to increase year-on-year and the journal appears to be the only peer-reviewed journal in the world in the records management discipline. The journal has responded to and kept abreast of the records management agenda. Research limitations/implications -The analysis is based on the work of the current and immediate past Editor and did not seek the views of its Editorial Board members, readers or contributors to the journal. Practical implications -Looking to the future, the journal must seek to widen its impact on other key stakeholders in managing information and records -managers, information systems designers, information creators and users -as well as records professionals. It must also continue to develop the scope of its content, whilst maintaining its focus on managing records, and must keep pace with technology developments. It should try to influence the professional agenda, be controversial, stimulate debate and encourage change. And it should remain a quality resource. Originality/value -The paper provides a unique critical analysis of the journal, its history and contribution to the development of records management, on its 20th anniversary of publication.

show abstract

An evaluation of MoReq2 in the context of national EDRMS standard developments in the UK and Europe

Cited by 13 publications

References 4 publications

An Evaluation of TS13298 in the Scope of MoReq2

An Evaluation of TS13298 in the Scope of MoReq2

Enterprise Content Management Implementation: An Overview of Phases, Standards and Best Practice Guidelines

Development of RMJ

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About