1992
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90283-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of multicriteria analysis for DSS in public policy decision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The PROMETHEE method attempts to "model" a very complex structure of the problem, and by engaging a team of experts, it makes the evaluation procedure and the weight determination of each group of criteria which are evidently in conflict as objective as possible. The influence exerted by the parameters of each criterion's weight on the obtained solution was estimated by different scenarios of weight determination and by an analysis of the stability of criterion weights [65].…”
Section: Applied Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PROMETHEE method attempts to "model" a very complex structure of the problem, and by engaging a team of experts, it makes the evaluation procedure and the weight determination of each group of criteria which are evidently in conflict as objective as possible. The influence exerted by the parameters of each criterion's weight on the obtained solution was estimated by different scenarios of weight determination and by an analysis of the stability of criterion weights [65].…”
Section: Applied Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic PROMETHEE/GIS Mladineo et al (1987) Ranking the locations for the construction of small scale hydro plants - Mladineo et al (1992) Deciding on alternative solutions of the highway route according to DSS - Pavic and Babic (1991) The location choice of a production system - Radojevic and Petrovic (1997) Ranking alternative roads in Belgrade-Birmingham route problem Fuzzy IF-THEN rules Raveh (2000) A location problem/ranking locations Graphic display technique Ribarovic and Mladineo (1987) Ranking the locations of the ready-mixed concrete plants - Wang and Yang (2007) Ranking candidate information systems/information system outsourcing -technology, environmental impacts, sociology, and economic factors, and then proposed development directions and strategy for future energy systems in Taiwan. Goumas and Lygerou (2000) conducted a research by fuzzy PROMETHEE II to evaluate and to rank alternative energy exploitation schemes of a low temperature geothermal field.…”
Section: Author(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References N Prior to 1990 Briggs et al (1990), D'Avignon and , and Mareschal and Brans (1988) 3 1991to 1994Brans and Mareschal (1994a, Brans and Mareschal (1994b), Hendriks et al (1992), Hens et al (1992), Keller et al (1991), Kokot et al (1992a), Kokot et al (1992b), Mareschal et al (1992), Mladineo et al (1992), and Vuk et al (1991) 10 1995 to 1999 Al-Rashdan et al (1999), Espinasse et al (1997), Hokkanen and Salminen (1997), Kokot and Phuong (1999), Le Téno (1999), Macharis et al (1998), Martin et al (1999), Ozelkan and Duckstein (1996), Pandey and Kengpol (1995), and Radojevic and Petrovic (1997) 10 2000 to Anagnostopoulos et al (2003, Ayoko et al (2003), Ayoko et al (2004), Brans (2002), Carroll et al (2004), Dulmin and Mininno (2003), Khalil et al (2004), Ni et al (2002), Ni et al (2004), and Rogers et al (2004) 10…”
Section: Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision process is a generic process that can be applied to any kind of organised set of activities to meet objectives. Generally, there is no unique model of decision processes, because they include numerous variables, different levels of decisions (strategic, tactical, and operational), as well as different decision makers (Mladineo et al, 1992).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various multi-criteria methods, due to its good performance (Guitouni and Martel, 1998), the PROMETHEE II method was chosen (Brans and Mareschal, 1991) and implemented into a GIS. PROMETHEE II is accepted by decision-makers because it is comprehensive and can present visualised results as proven in the application of this method in other engineering problems (Mladineo et al, 1987; 1992).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%