2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of multiple algorithms for the measurement of the heart rate corrected JTpeak interval

Abstract: Interest in the effects of drugs on the heart rate-corrected JTpeak (JTpc) interval from the body-surface ECG has spawned an increasing number of scientific investigations in the field of regulatory sciences, and more specifically in the context of the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative. We conducted a novel initiative to evaluate the role of automatic JTpc measurement technologies by comparing their ability to distinguish multi- from single-channel blocking drugs. A set of 5,232 ECGs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pursuant to these observations, at a recent presentation by Vicente [81], updated commentary was provided about the utility of measuring the early phase (J-T peak c) and late phase (J-T peak c-Tend) of the J-T interval as biomarkers that may modulate proarrhythmic concerns in the setting of a moderately positive QT signal and reduce the need for intensive ECG monitoring in late stage trials. To this end, open source code was released by the FDA using a vector magnitude function and software vendors including AMPS [82], Mortara and Philips have developed technology which offers measurement of these intervals based upon different mathematical models [83]. Although a meaningful disparity between the different vendors’ algorithms has not been evidenced, a number of critical elements in this approach have yet to be standardized which may affect the accuracy and utility of this biomarker.…”
Section: Current Fda Guidance For Assessing Qt Liabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pursuant to these observations, at a recent presentation by Vicente [81], updated commentary was provided about the utility of measuring the early phase (J-T peak c) and late phase (J-T peak c-Tend) of the J-T interval as biomarkers that may modulate proarrhythmic concerns in the setting of a moderately positive QT signal and reduce the need for intensive ECG monitoring in late stage trials. To this end, open source code was released by the FDA using a vector magnitude function and software vendors including AMPS [82], Mortara and Philips have developed technology which offers measurement of these intervals based upon different mathematical models [83]. Although a meaningful disparity between the different vendors’ algorithms has not been evidenced, a number of critical elements in this approach have yet to be standardized which may affect the accuracy and utility of this biomarker.…”
Section: Current Fda Guidance For Assessing Qt Liabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the J‐Tpeak interval can be corrected for heart rate and has sufficient power to differentiate changes with exposure–response analysis in the small sample sizes (Section 2 in the statistical analysis plan in the Online Supplement) typical of phase I studies. The J‐Tpeakc analysis algorithm has been released as an open‐source code to facilitate widespread testing (https://github.com/FDA/ecglib), which has been performed by multiple independent groups as a part of an “ECG challenge” associated with the 2017 International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology annual conference …”
Section: Rationale and Components Of Cipamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses using concentration‐response models as well as an analysis based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the J‐T peak c was the best biomarker to differentiate balanced ion channel block from predominant hERG block . In addition, analyses using different J‐T peak c ECG methods by other research groups showed similar results . These findings suggest that J‐T peak c might be used to differentiate QTc‐prolonging drugs with predominant hERG block versus balanced ion channel block.…”
Section: Evidence Of the Usefulness Of J‐tpeak Interval In Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…5,19 In addition, analyses using different J-T peak c ECG methods by other research groups showed similar results. 20,21 These findings suggest that J-T peak c might be used to differentiate QTc-prolonging drugs with predominant hERG block versus balanced ion channel block.…”
Section: Evidence Of the Usefulness Of J-t Peak Interval In Assessmenmentioning
confidence: 98%