Abstract:Interest in the effects of drugs on the heart rate-corrected JTpeak (JTpc) interval from the body-surface ECG has spawned an increasing number of scientific investigations in the field of regulatory sciences, and more specifically in the context of the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative. We conducted a novel initiative to evaluate the role of automatic JTpc measurement technologies by comparing their ability to distinguish multi- from single-channel blocking drugs. A set of 5,232 ECGs… Show more
“…Pursuant to these observations, at a recent presentation by Vicente [81], updated commentary was provided about the utility of measuring the early phase (J-T peak c) and late phase (J-T peak c-Tend) of the J-T interval as biomarkers that may modulate proarrhythmic concerns in the setting of a moderately positive QT signal and reduce the need for intensive ECG monitoring in late stage trials. To this end, open source code was released by the FDA using a vector magnitude function and software vendors including AMPS [82], Mortara and Philips have developed technology which offers measurement of these intervals based upon different mathematical models [83]. Although a meaningful disparity between the different vendors’ algorithms has not been evidenced, a number of critical elements in this approach have yet to be standardized which may affect the accuracy and utility of this biomarker.…”
Section: Current Fda Guidance For Assessing Qt Liabilitymentioning
The QT interval occupies a pivotal role in drug development as a surface biomarker of ventricular repolarization. The electrophysiologic substrate for QT prolongation coupled with reports of non-cardiac drugs producing lethal arrhythmias captured worldwide attention from government regulators eventuating in a series of guidance documents that require virtually all new chemical compounds to undergo rigorous preclinical and clinical testing to profile their QT liability. While prolongation or shortening of the QT interval may herald the appearance of serious cardiac arrhythmias, the positive predictive value of an abnormal QT measurement for these arrhythmias is modest, especially in the absence of confounding clinical features or a congenital predisposition that increases the risk of syncope and sudden death. Consequently, there has been a paradigm shift to assess a compound’s cardiac risk of arrhythmias centered on a mechanistic approach to arrhythmogenesis rather than focusing solely on the QT interval. This entails both robust preclinical and clinical assays along with the emergence of concentration QT modeling as a primary analysis tool to determine whether delayed ventricular repolarization is present. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the QT interval and highlight its central role in early drug development.
“…Pursuant to these observations, at a recent presentation by Vicente [81], updated commentary was provided about the utility of measuring the early phase (J-T peak c) and late phase (J-T peak c-Tend) of the J-T interval as biomarkers that may modulate proarrhythmic concerns in the setting of a moderately positive QT signal and reduce the need for intensive ECG monitoring in late stage trials. To this end, open source code was released by the FDA using a vector magnitude function and software vendors including AMPS [82], Mortara and Philips have developed technology which offers measurement of these intervals based upon different mathematical models [83]. Although a meaningful disparity between the different vendors’ algorithms has not been evidenced, a number of critical elements in this approach have yet to be standardized which may affect the accuracy and utility of this biomarker.…”
Section: Current Fda Guidance For Assessing Qt Liabilitymentioning
The QT interval occupies a pivotal role in drug development as a surface biomarker of ventricular repolarization. The electrophysiologic substrate for QT prolongation coupled with reports of non-cardiac drugs producing lethal arrhythmias captured worldwide attention from government regulators eventuating in a series of guidance documents that require virtually all new chemical compounds to undergo rigorous preclinical and clinical testing to profile their QT liability. While prolongation or shortening of the QT interval may herald the appearance of serious cardiac arrhythmias, the positive predictive value of an abnormal QT measurement for these arrhythmias is modest, especially in the absence of confounding clinical features or a congenital predisposition that increases the risk of syncope and sudden death. Consequently, there has been a paradigm shift to assess a compound’s cardiac risk of arrhythmias centered on a mechanistic approach to arrhythmogenesis rather than focusing solely on the QT interval. This entails both robust preclinical and clinical assays along with the emergence of concentration QT modeling as a primary analysis tool to determine whether delayed ventricular repolarization is present. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the QT interval and highlight its central role in early drug development.
“…In addition, the J‐Tpeak interval can be corrected for heart rate and has sufficient power to differentiate changes with exposure–response analysis in the small sample sizes (Section 2 in the statistical analysis plan in the Online Supplement) typical of phase I studies. The J‐Tpeakc analysis algorithm has been released as an open‐source code to facilitate widespread testing (https://github.com/FDA/ecglib), which has been performed by multiple independent groups as a part of an “ECG challenge” associated with the 2017 International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology annual conference …”
Section: Rationale and Components Of Cipamentioning
The Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative is developing and validating a mechanistic‐based assessment of the proarrhythmic risk of drugs. CiPA proposes to assess a drug's effect on multiple ion channels and integrate the effects in a computer model of the human cardiomyocyte to predict proarrhythmic risk. Unanticipated or missed effects will be assessed with human stem cell‐derived cardiomyocytes and electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in early phase I clinical trials. This article provides an overview of CiPA and the rationale and design of the CiPA phase I ECG validation clinical trial, which involves assessing an additional ECG biomarker (J‐Tpeak) for QT prolonging drugs. If successful, CiPA will 1) create a pathway for drugs with hERG block / QT prolongation to advance without intensive ECG monitoring in phase III trials if they have low proarrhythmic risk; and 2) enable updating drug labels to be more informative about proarrhythmic risk, not just QT prolongation.
“…Analyses using concentration‐response models as well as an analysis based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the J‐T peak c was the best biomarker to differentiate balanced ion channel block from predominant hERG block . In addition, analyses using different J‐T peak c ECG methods by other research groups showed similar results . These findings suggest that J‐T peak c might be used to differentiate QTc‐prolonging drugs with predominant hERG block versus balanced ion channel block.…”
Section: Evidence Of the Usefulness Of J‐tpeak Interval In Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…5,19 In addition, analyses using different J-T peak c ECG methods by other research groups showed similar results. 20,21 These findings suggest that J-T peak c might be used to differentiate QTc-prolonging drugs with predominant hERG block versus balanced ion channel block.…”
Section: Evidence Of the Usefulness Of J-t Peak Interval In Assessmenmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.