2000
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.37.11.866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling

Abstract: Background-The discovery of the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 has improved our ability to counsel women at increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. The objective of our study was to identify the needs of women who have undergone genetic counselling and testing for BRCA1/2 and to determine the impact of receiving a positive BRCA1/2 result. This is the first study to report on a large group of women who have received positive BRCA1/2 mutation results. Methods-Quest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
80
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Having difficulties in deciding about, and coping with the impact of, riskreducing surgeries was a common theme, underscoring findings from related studies demonstrating high levels of unmet information needs in this area. 25,26 Before discussing the clinical implications of the findings, the limitations of the study should be mentioned. As with all qualitative studies, statistically valid generalisations cannot be undertaken, nor can causal relationships be established; however, we have also undertaken a quantitative comparison of women with and without a family history, the results of which will be reported separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Having difficulties in deciding about, and coping with the impact of, riskreducing surgeries was a common theme, underscoring findings from related studies demonstrating high levels of unmet information needs in this area. 25,26 Before discussing the clinical implications of the findings, the limitations of the study should be mentioned. As with all qualitative studies, statistically valid generalisations cannot be undertaken, nor can causal relationships be established; however, we have also undertaken a quantitative comparison of women with and without a family history, the results of which will be reported separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 When different coping strategies are used, the informed individual may feel coerced to act on the information and undergo testing. 22,32 Where those who had communicated discovered that family members had felt coerced by them to undergo testing, they reported feeling remorseful. 22 Familial experiences with cancer Experience with breast cancer within a family may also play a role in communication of HBOC risk.…”
Section: Proximity Of Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Metcalfe et al (2000), 58 % of carriers reported that screening behavior increased since receiving a test result, especially in women less than 59 years old and in women with no previous clinical diagnosis of cancer. Lerman et al (2000) surveyed 216 females at risk for breast cancer (84 BRCA1/2 carriers, 83 noncarriers, and 49 test decliners).…”
Section: Familial Breast Cancer (Brca1/2)mentioning
confidence: 99%