2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of postmortem concentrations of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individually there was substantial variability between cases preventing any useful estimation for use in future cases. The lack of any appreciable average change in THC concentration post‐mortem has been observed by other researchers (Chu, 2002; Hoffman et al, 2020; Holland et al, 2011). This is surprising given the high lipid solubility of THC with a V D of about 10 L/kg (Huestis, 2007), a log P of 5.6 (PubChem) and the high concentrations of THC in deceased users of cannabis in at least lung, muscle and fat tissues (Chu, 2002; Cliburn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Time‐dependent Redistributionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, individually there was substantial variability between cases preventing any useful estimation for use in future cases. The lack of any appreciable average change in THC concentration post‐mortem has been observed by other researchers (Chu, 2002; Hoffman et al, 2020; Holland et al, 2011). This is surprising given the high lipid solubility of THC with a V D of about 10 L/kg (Huestis, 2007), a log P of 5.6 (PubChem) and the high concentrations of THC in deceased users of cannabis in at least lung, muscle and fat tissues (Chu, 2002; Cliburn et al, 2021).…”
Section: Time‐dependent Redistributionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is surprising given the high lipid solubility of THC with a V D of about 10 L/kg (Huestis, 2007), a log P of 5.6 (PubChem) and the high concentrations of THC in deceased users of cannabis in at least lung, muscle and fat tissues (Chu, 2002; Cliburn et al, 2021). One explanation proposed is that liver concentration differences to blood are an indicator of the extent of post‐mortem changes in blood concentration and THC shows little affinity for liver tissue, hence the apparent low redistribution after death (Hoffman et al, 2020). However, since there are relatively large increases from just before death to admission to the mortuary followed by a decline over the next few days (Chu et al, 2020), suggests a much more dynamic process is occurring; possibly a combination of distribution and redistribution in a setting of developing autolytic changes.…”
Section: Time‐dependent Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Australian study based on the National Coronial Information System counted 104 deaths in which cannabis was the only substance listed, of which 36.5% were suicide and 28.8% were accidental injury 89 . Thirty‐six other cases of deaths have been reported in the literature; among them, thirty one were due to cardiovascular diseases, 4,90–94 two to renal and ionic complications of hyperemesis syndrome, 91 one to seizure complications linked to multiple sclerosis, with identification of cannabis in toxicological assessments, 91 one to self‐mutilation after oral cannabis consumption, 7 and one to extensive necrosis and haemorrhage of the liver and adrenals following maternal use of marijuana in an 11‐day‐old neonate 95 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Hoffman et al, including 24 decedents, investigated i.e. central blood to peripheral blood ratios for THC in postmortem cases [25]. The median ratio of central blood to peripheral blood was 1.1 (0.30-4.05) for THC in samples with preservatives.…”
Section: Cardiac Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%