1968
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(68)90060-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of several differencing methods for inviscid fluid flow problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A challenging test for computing unsteady shock waves is the numerical simulation of a wind tunnel with a flat faced step, originally introduced in [44] to compare several difference schemes in classical fluid dynamics. It is now a standard numerical benchmark (see, e.g.…”
Section: The Forward-facing Step Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A challenging test for computing unsteady shock waves is the numerical simulation of a wind tunnel with a flat faced step, originally introduced in [44] to compare several difference schemes in classical fluid dynamics. It is now a standard numerical benchmark (see, e.g.…”
Section: The Forward-facing Step Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may consider the channel to be a stylized engine inlet of a supersonic aircraft. In fact it is just a benchmark geometry [34,35]. The red vertical valve in the bottom of the channel instantaneously snaps up, such that, together with the red horizontal plate, it forms a step which suddenly chokes part of the channel.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forward-facing step problem was introduced by Emery 3 and later used, among others, by Woodward and Colella 13 . The problem starts with a Mach 3 flow in a wind tunnel section.…”
Section: Forward-facing Stepmentioning
confidence: 99%