SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-0990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Several Methods for Calculating Transient Trapped Air Mass with Emphasis on the “Delta P” Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…for misfire detection [67], for incylinder trapped air mass estimation [22,68,69], etc. ); however, it has not been implemented until recently to series production.…”
Section: Combustion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for misfire detection [67], for incylinder trapped air mass estimation [22,68,69], etc. ); however, it has not been implemented until recently to series production.…”
Section: Combustion Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the behaviour of the residual fraction variation is quite different of that obtained in spark ignited engines [21][22][23], where intake manifold throttling can cause exhaust to intake density ratio importantly increase. On the other hand, in the case of important valve overlap, both shortcut rate and residual gas fraction can importantly vary depending on the operative conditions.…”
Section: Air Mass Flow and Air Chargementioning
confidence: 82%
“…The method used in this paper, known as the Dp-method, has been previously applied to naturally aspirated spark ignited engines [20] (and with different modifications in [21][22][23]), but no experience on turbocharged diesel engines has been published. This method is based on the analysis of the pressure evolution of the in-cylinder pressure during the compression stroke: the pressure increase between two known points of the compression stroke can be correlated with the air charge in the cylinder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In research environments it is usually addressed by determining each flow separately (ṁ air , m f uel ,ṁ EGR ,...) by independent measurements or models [20]. The stationary uncertainty associated is quantified around 5% [21] due to the multiple sources of uncertainties, while the transient errors are considered an important 120 problem because of the flow assumptions [22]. Other alternatives, such as volumetric efficiency equation [20], emptying-and-filling models [23,24,25] or ∆p methods [22,26] suffer from the simplistic approach and the use of parameters that are considered to be known and invariant with engine operation (such as volumetric efficiency, in-cylinder gas temperature, polytropic coefficient during…”
Section: Trapped Mass Estimation 115mentioning
confidence: 99%