1965
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.28.2.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of surgical treatment for spinal cord compression due to metastatic carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
3

Year Published

1966
1966
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, this occurred in 60% of the cases, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) with respect to the frequency of cervical and lumbar localizations. This predominance of the thoracic localization is similar to that reflected in other series30, 35,40 (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In our series, this occurred in 60% of the cases, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) with respect to the frequency of cervical and lumbar localizations. This predominance of the thoracic localization is similar to that reflected in other series30, 35,40 (Fig. 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thirteen other patients suffered some postoperative complications, including epidural hemorrhage in 2, instability with subluxation of the spine in 4, wound infection in 4, and wound dehiscence or delayed closure in 3. 8 (22) 4 (13) 11 (29) 28 (33) 44 (32) 13 (25) 13 (38) 15 (37) 20 (39) 62 (38) 20 (31) 78 (35) 17 (50) 39 (30) 7 (27) 55 (61) 29 (45) . .…”
Section: Post -0pmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, there has been an observed propensity towards a particular spinal level of compression and the site of the primary lesion, such as colon or prostatic cancer metastasizing more frequently to the lumbosacral spine than carcinoma at other sites; bronchogenic or breast carcinoma, to the thoracic spine [2,6]. An additional observation by some authors [2,19,23] confirmed in this series, was that the duration or period of progression of symptomatology was relatively swifter in bronchogenic carcinoma than that from another site of primary malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%