2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Burden Among Older Adult Medicare-Covered Beneficiaries With Treatment-Resistant Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…atypical antipsychotics, antiepileptics, thyroid hormones, lithium and buspirone) used by the TRD group compared with the non-TRD group during the study is in line with expectations. Furthermore, this supports the results reported by other studies [8,49,51,58,66].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…atypical antipsychotics, antiepileptics, thyroid hormones, lithium and buspirone) used by the TRD group compared with the non-TRD group during the study is in line with expectations. Furthermore, this supports the results reported by other studies [8,49,51,58,66].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Of the 93,160 patients with MDD included in the current analysis, 10,469 (11%) met the criteria for TRD. This is consistent with the range of prevalence (9-16%) observed in previous analyses of Medicare [22,24], integrated delivery networks [25], and commercial health care databases [21,26]. Likewise, in the STAR*D clinical study, 11% of enrolled participants with MDD entered a third antidepressant therapy step following failure or intolerability of two previous steps (similar to the definition of TRD used in the current analysis) [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Exact 1:1 matching based on demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, and index year) was conducted to create matched cohorts of patients with TRD, non-TRD MDD, and with non-MDD. The statistical methods used for cohort matching in this study were identical to previously published studies that compared the economic burden of TRD versus non-TRD MDD and non-MDD [21][22][23][24][25][26]. Study variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including demographic and clinical characteristics, and outcome measures.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure of a treatment course was defined as a switch of an AD (no more than 180 days after the end of the previous treatment), the addition of an AD, or the initiation of an augmentation therapy. Initiation of a third AD or augmentation medication defined TRD, consistent with recent literature using insurance claims databases to identify patients with TRD 10,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] .…”
Section: Study Design Sample Selection and Study Cohortsmentioning
confidence: 62%