2014
DOI: 10.7249/rr655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Implementation and Perceived Utility of the Airman Resilience Training Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weaknesses most prominently identified within these programs appeared resultant of broader issues of timing, competing resources, and challenges with retention or uptake. Programs implemented during phases of basic training or within pre-existing briefings were not received to their greatest benefit for reasons of fatigue, receptiveness, and redundancy of information (Adler, Bliese, et al, 2015; Adler, Williams et al, 2015; Gonzalez et al, 2014). Resource challenges were specific to the need to distinguish these programs from similar programs within the armed forces environment (Beardslee et al, 2011), as well as competing resources, such as time, largely impacted by the ease of program access (Dodge et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weaknesses most prominently identified within these programs appeared resultant of broader issues of timing, competing resources, and challenges with retention or uptake. Programs implemented during phases of basic training or within pre-existing briefings were not received to their greatest benefit for reasons of fatigue, receptiveness, and redundancy of information (Adler, Bliese, et al, 2015; Adler, Williams et al, 2015; Gonzalez et al, 2014). Resource challenges were specific to the need to distinguish these programs from similar programs within the armed forces environment (Beardslee et al, 2011), as well as competing resources, such as time, largely impacted by the ease of program access (Dodge et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected articles included those employing mental skills within this context through research on applicability or feasibility, survey studies, or program application and development. Final studies included focused on three major areas of mental skills application: 10 RCT or intervention studies (i.e., Adler et al, 2009; Fitzwater et al, 2018; Forbes et al, 2001; Jensen et al, 2020; Pickering et al, 2010; Taylor et al, 2011); 22 development, implementation, evaluation, or feasibility/applicability studies (i.e., Beardslee et al, 2011; Bui et al, 2018; DeFraia et al, 2014; Dodge et al, 2018; Gonzalez et al, 2014; Kees & Rosenblum, 2015; Lester et al, 2015; Perlman et al, 2010; Precious & Lindsay, 2019); and 9 explanatory studies (i.e., Casey, 2011; Herzog & Deuster, 2014; Reivich et al, 2011; Smith, 2013; Tedeschi & McNally, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This program is a group application that focuses on resilience, emotion control, taking responsibility, selfconfidence, and flexibility. Gonzalez, Singh, Schell & Weinick (2014), prepared a program to improve the ability of aviation workers to cope with stressful events, to enable aviation workers to adapt smoothly to work and family life after returning from duty "to ensure the resilience of aviators, to increase their performance, to strengthen the mind, body, and spirit using a skill-based approach . "At the end of the program, individuals' resilience levels increased.…”
Section: Action Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the study focused only on existing programs and did not evaluate their effectiveness (Robson, 2014). A separate RAND study found that airmen who received the Airman Resilience Training intervention during deployment and reintegration did not perceive it to be useful (Gonzalez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resilience Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%