2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-010-0372-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Potential of High-Intensity Ultrasound for Improving the Microbial Safety of Poultry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to anaerobic bacteria and LAB, high-intensity ultrasound had no signifi cant effect (P > 0.05) on the growth of mesophilic bacteria at any storage time. These results do not agree with previous reports (DOLATOWSKI and STASIAK, 2002), where aerobic and mesophilic (HAUGHTON et al, 2010) bacteria could be controlled by high-intensity ultrasound. Ultrasound with 0.1% OEO did not decrease mesophilic bacteria growth, showing no effect on that bacterium group until 21 days of storage.…”
Section: Mesophilic Bacteriacontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly to anaerobic bacteria and LAB, high-intensity ultrasound had no signifi cant effect (P > 0.05) on the growth of mesophilic bacteria at any storage time. These results do not agree with previous reports (DOLATOWSKI and STASIAK, 2002), where aerobic and mesophilic (HAUGHTON et al, 2010) bacteria could be controlled by high-intensity ultrasound. Ultrasound with 0.1% OEO did not decrease mesophilic bacteria growth, showing no effect on that bacterium group until 21 days of storage.…”
Section: Mesophilic Bacteriacontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, several authors have shown that the combination of OEO with other preservation methods further Acta Alimentaria 44, 2015 enhances the control of microbial growth (CHOULIARA et al, 2007). Non-thermal treatments, such as high-intensity ultrasound, can also help to control microbial growth in foods, such as chicken meat (HAUGHTON et al, 2010), milk (CAMERON, 2007), water (HUNTER et al, 2008), fruit juices (CHENG et al, 2007), and vegetables (ZHOU et al, 2009). The antibacterial action of high-intensity ultrasound is attributable to the phenomenon of cavitation (CAMERON, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous flow ultrasound treatment combined with mild heat (57 C) for 18 min resulted in a 5-log reduction of L. monocytogenes in ultrahigh-temperature milk, a 5-log reduction in total aerobic bacteria in raw milk (D'amico et al, 2006). Studies indicated TS increased the lethality of conventional pasteurization and lowered maximum processing temperature, which was expected to minimize adverse effects on the sensory and nutritional quality of food (Cabeza, Ordonez, Cambero, De La Hoz, & Garcia, 2004;Haughton et al, 2012). Wordon, Mortimer, and McMaster (2012) reported that the death rate of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 55 or 60 C was enhanced when it was pretreated with 1 min sonication followed by the immediate heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Haughton et al (2011b) investigated the efficacy of high and low intensity ultrasound (20 kW/L and 20 W/L, respectively) under laboratory conditions. Moreover, Haughton et al (2011b) investigated the efficacy of high and low intensity ultrasound (20 kW/L and 20 W/L, respectively) under laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%