2007
DOI: 10.1097/olq.0b013e3181124473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Relative Sensitivities of the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory Test and the Treponema pallidum Particle Agglutination Test Among Patients Diagnosed With Primary Syphilis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
33
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In 37 of these patients, the initially positive treponemal IgM declined after therapy, proving that the VDRL result was false-negative. Thus, VDRL test sensitivity was only 58% for primary syphilis, which is lower than previously reported sensitivities of between 66% and 87% [911]. Despite this, the VDRL test has been used for first-line screening in the United States [9], and is recommended in textbooks [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In 37 of these patients, the initially positive treponemal IgM declined after therapy, proving that the VDRL result was false-negative. Thus, VDRL test sensitivity was only 58% for primary syphilis, which is lower than previously reported sensitivities of between 66% and 87% [911]. Despite this, the VDRL test has been used for first-line screening in the United States [9], and is recommended in textbooks [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Serologic testing has reduced sensitivity in very early disease and may fail to capture subjects with early treated disease 36 . Further, incident syphilis is best characterized by measuring rates of early stage disease (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because they do not become positive until 10–15 days after onset of the primary lesion, 25–30% of primary syphilis cases may be missed (Fig. 6) 132,133 . Although relatively simple and inexpensive, NTTs must be performed manually on serum, and rely on subjective interpretation (Table 2).…”
Section: Diagnosis Screening and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not recommended for resolution of discordant TT/NTT results due to potentially lower sensitivity and specificity than other TTs 132,204 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%