2004
DOI: 10.1177/0021955x04043719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of the Thermal Conductivity of Extruded Polystyrene Foam Blown with HFC-134a or HCFC-142b

Abstract: Insulation performance of extruded polystyrene (XPS) foams expanded with various halogenated blowing agents including HFC-134a or HCFC-142b was measured over time. Residual blowing agents were measured after aging up to 26 years. The diffusive transport properties of the blowing agents can be determined through the mathematical calculation of the heat transfer in the gas phase component of the foam thermal conductivity. These values are used in a Dow model which allows an accurate prediction of the long-term t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the HFCs seem persistent in landfill environments a larger fraction of the HFC disposed of in foam waste a The table also presents the effect of lower degradation rate coefficient (a factor of 10; 0.1k1) and a higher diffusion coefficient (a factor of 10; 10D). b Diffusion coefficients used: 2.0‚10 -14 m 2 s -1 (CFC-11)(4); 2.9‚10 -14 m 2 s -1 (HCFC-141b)(4); 5.1‚10 -14 m 2 s -1 (CFC-12)(36); 5.4‚10 -12 m 2 s -1 (HCFC-22) (36). The degradation rate coefficients, k1, in the runs with MOCLA-FOAM are average microcosm rates based on values listed in Table 2 (0.309, 0.029, 0.015, and 0.016 for CFC-11, CFC-12, HCFC-22, and HCFC-141b, respectively).…”
Section: Modeling the Emission And Degradation Of Foam Released Halocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the HFCs seem persistent in landfill environments a larger fraction of the HFC disposed of in foam waste a The table also presents the effect of lower degradation rate coefficient (a factor of 10; 0.1k1) and a higher diffusion coefficient (a factor of 10; 10D). b Diffusion coefficients used: 2.0‚10 -14 m 2 s -1 (CFC-11)(4); 2.9‚10 -14 m 2 s -1 (HCFC-141b)(4); 5.1‚10 -14 m 2 s -1 (CFC-12)(36); 5.4‚10 -12 m 2 s -1 (HCFC-22) (36). The degradation rate coefficients, k1, in the runs with MOCLA-FOAM are average microcosm rates based on values listed in Table 2 (0.309, 0.029, 0.015, and 0.016 for CFC-11, CFC-12, HCFC-22, and HCFC-141b, respectively).…”
Section: Modeling the Emission And Degradation Of Foam Released Halocmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the UNEP reports and Task Force groups have worked to resolve this matter [1,[12][13][14][17][18][19][20]24]. To this end, it is important that predictions of the emission rates of these substances be accurate and reliable [16]. At the very least, reliability of the models is enhanced when the trends in atmospheric measurements are consistent with production and use data [27,29].…”
Section: Emissions -Tonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 In addition, hydrocarbons such as butane or pentane as well as fluorohydrocarbons such as HFC 134a or HFC 245fa still are the major industrially used blowing agents to produce thermoplastic foams. [3][4][5] The use of renewable resources, the reduction of packaging waste, and the minimization of emissions become more and more important with respect to a more sustainable economy. Traditional foam polymers as well as most of the conventional blowing agents used do not fulfill all of the requirements for sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%