1984
DOI: 10.2166/wst.1984.0193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Urban Design Storm Sensitivity

Abstract: This paper describes an evaluation of the assumption commonly employed in drainage design that the return period of the rainfall used to design a system is the same as the peak flow produced by that rainfall. Specifically, the sensitivity of the frequency response of three catchments to design storm parameters is examined. Parameters include, hyetograph shape, antecedent soil moisture and rainfall duration. A continuous simulation model is used to compute simulated historical frequency responses for three diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation of storm properties is based on the identification of a single storm event. Various methods exist for identifying independent storm events [ Bonta and Rao , ; Pagan‐Trindad , ], such as arbitrary separation [ Huff , ], the autocorrelation method [ Wenzel and Voorhees , ], and a procedure based on rank correlation coefficients [ Grace and Eagleson , ]. We identify the independent storm events in each location using the criterion of a specified minimum dry period [ Jiang et al ., ; Menabde and Sivapalan , ; Palecki et al ., ; Restrepo‐Posada and Eagleson , ; Robinson and Sivapalan , ; Samuel and Sivapalan , ].…”
Section: Methodology Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of storm properties is based on the identification of a single storm event. Various methods exist for identifying independent storm events [ Bonta and Rao , ; Pagan‐Trindad , ], such as arbitrary separation [ Huff , ], the autocorrelation method [ Wenzel and Voorhees , ], and a procedure based on rank correlation coefficients [ Grace and Eagleson , ]. We identify the independent storm events in each location using the criterion of a specified minimum dry period [ Jiang et al ., ; Menabde and Sivapalan , ; Palecki et al ., ; Restrepo‐Posada and Eagleson , ; Robinson and Sivapalan , ; Samuel and Sivapalan , ].…”
Section: Methodology Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bonta and Rao (1988), there are several methods for delimitating independent rainfall events, such as choosing a minimum inter-event time dry period (Dunkerley, 2008b), either arbitrarily or based on some reasoned criteria, such as an autocorrelation analysis (Asquith et al, 2005;Wenzel and Voorhees, 1981), choosing a rank correlation coefficient (Grace and Eagleson, 1967) or using the exponential method (Restrepo-Posada and Eagleson, 1982). The works that employ autocorrelation choose a minimum period based on the lag time at which the autocorrelation coefficient falls below a certain threshold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods (such as arbitrary separation, auto-correlation, the exponential method and the range of correlation) have been used to identify individual storms [55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Storm Events Identification and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%