2000
DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.suppl_3.iii61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An evaluation of videotaped vignettes for smoking cessation and relapse prevention during pregnancy: the Very Important Pregnant Smokers (VIPS) program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The trials were conducted in the United States, China, Norway, Scotland, Finland, Italy, and Australia between 1987 and 2010. Forty-seven studies were excluded for the following reasons: quit rates were not reported or were not reported separately for intervention and control groups, or numbers of participants were not reported (24 studies ; the study design was not a controlled trial [11 studies [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] ]), the interventions were not aimed at parents of young children (9 studies [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] ); the reporting period was less than 1 month (1 study 79 ); a protocol only was reported (1 study 80 ); the report was not in English (1 study 81 ). The flowchart describing the identification process can be found in Fig 1. Study characteristics of included trials are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The trials were conducted in the United States, China, Norway, Scotland, Finland, Italy, and Australia between 1987 and 2010. Forty-seven studies were excluded for the following reasons: quit rates were not reported or were not reported separately for intervention and control groups, or numbers of participants were not reported (24 studies ; the study design was not a controlled trial [11 studies [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] ]), the interventions were not aimed at parents of young children (9 studies [70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] ); the reporting period was less than 1 month (1 study 79 ); a protocol only was reported (1 study 80 ); the report was not in English (1 study 81 ). The flowchart describing the identification process can be found in Fig 1. Study characteristics of included trials are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Many programs have piggybacked with programs such as Women, Infants, and Children; Medicaid; health maintenance organizations (HMOs), and other organized, standardized, prenatal programs. 6,42,43 Some people have tried more unusual methods of reaching pregnant smokers, for example through videotape, 42 digitally interactive programs, 38 and peer telephone support. 30 Most of these programs have combined intervention strategies, hoping to increase success rates.…”
Section: Interventions That Maintain Smoking Cessation During Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 The programs should also include personal interaction with clinicians and/or support staff. 42 Furthermore, providers should educate women about the dangers of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, 5,28 and about the risks of smoking for the woman, not just the baby. 21 They should address a woman's social sphere by increasing community awareness about why women who are pregnant should not smoke, 22 encouraging a woman's social network to support her with positive encouragement rather than negative nagging, 30,34,39 and including her partner and others living in the home in any cessation effort.…”
Section: Interventions That Maintain Smoking Cessation During Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruiting participants for clinical trials can be challenging in general (e.g., Harris et al, 2003;Ross et al, 1999), and this has been particularly the case for smoking cessation trials of pregnant women, which often have difficulty meeting accrual goals (e.g., Cinciripini et al, 2000;Emmons et al, 2000;Goldenberg et al, 2000; Pollak et al, 2006;Ruggiero et al, 2003;Solomon et al, 2000;Strecher et al, 2000). Trials focusing on relapse prevention with this population have the additional challenge of recruiting from a yet smaller proportion of the population: pregnant women who smoked prior to their pregnancy but are currently abstaining from smoking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, by resuming smoking, the mother also reexposes herself to the myriad health risks associated with tobacco use. Given the high rate of self-quitting among pregnant smokers, as well as the success of interventions designed to motivate pregnant women to quit smoking (Melvin et al, 2000), pregnancy and the early postpartum period appear to offer unique opportunities to provide smoking relapseprevention interventions, although such efforts have met with at best modest success to date (Mullen, 2004).Recruiting participants for clinical trials can be challenging in general (e.g., Harris et al, 2003;Ross et al, 1999), and this has been particularly the case for smoking cessation trials of pregnant women, which often have difficulty meeting accrual goals (e.g., Cinciripini et al, 2000;Emmons et al, 2000;Goldenberg et al, 2000; Pollak et al, 2006;Ruggiero et al, 2003;Solomon et al, 2000;Strecher et al, 2000). Trials focusing on relapse prevention with this population have the additional challenge of recruiting from a yet smaller proportion of the population: pregnant women who smoked prior to their pregnancy but are currently abstaining from smoking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%