2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evaluation of Washington State SNAP-Ed Farmers' Market Initiatives and SNAP Participant Behaviors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…J. Johnson, 2013;O'Kane, 2016;Savoie Roskos, 2017), 'social benefits' (12.5%, n=3) (Baker et al, 2009;Feagan et al, 2004;Velasquez, Eastman, & Masiunas, 2005), 'community pride' (12.5%, n=3) (A. J. Johnson, 2013;Payet et al, 2005;Savoie Roskos, 2017), and participation in special events or community activities hosted by the farmers market (16.7%, n=4) (Eastwood et al, 1999;Grace et al, 2007;Hunt, 2007;Walkinshaw et al, 2018). Additionally, in 50% of the articles (n=12) (Colasanti et al, 2010;Eastwood et al, 1999;Feagan & Morris, 2009;Freedman et al, 2018;Grace et al, 2007;Hunt, 2007;Misyak et al, 2014;O'Kane, 2016;Ritter, Walkinshaw, Quinn, Ickes, & Johnson, 2018;Sommer, Herrick, & Sommer, 1981;Velasquez et al, 2005;Wetherill & Gray, 2015), the authors described the 'shopping atmosphere and/or environment' as either welcoming or unwelcoming, which served as a barrier to or facilitator of farmers market usage based on the shopper's perspective of the shopping atmosphere.…”
Section: Description Of Soc In the Included Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…J. Johnson, 2013;O'Kane, 2016;Savoie Roskos, 2017), 'social benefits' (12.5%, n=3) (Baker et al, 2009;Feagan et al, 2004;Velasquez, Eastman, & Masiunas, 2005), 'community pride' (12.5%, n=3) (A. J. Johnson, 2013;Payet et al, 2005;Savoie Roskos, 2017), and participation in special events or community activities hosted by the farmers market (16.7%, n=4) (Eastwood et al, 1999;Grace et al, 2007;Hunt, 2007;Walkinshaw et al, 2018). Additionally, in 50% of the articles (n=12) (Colasanti et al, 2010;Eastwood et al, 1999;Feagan & Morris, 2009;Freedman et al, 2018;Grace et al, 2007;Hunt, 2007;Misyak et al, 2014;O'Kane, 2016;Ritter, Walkinshaw, Quinn, Ickes, & Johnson, 2018;Sommer, Herrick, & Sommer, 1981;Velasquez et al, 2005;Wetherill & Gray, 2015), the authors described the 'shopping atmosphere and/or environment' as either welcoming or unwelcoming, which served as a barrier to or facilitator of farmers market usage based on the shopper's perspective of the shopping atmosphere.…”
Section: Description Of Soc In the Included Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While incentive programs have proven successful in increasing farmers market SNAP redemption and self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption by people living with low incomes (Evans et al, 2012;Jilcott Pitts et al, 2013;Walkinshaw, Quinn, Rocha, & Johnson, 2018), SNAP redemption at farmers markets continues to represent a small fraction (<0.1%) of all SNAP transactions across the U.S. (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2019). The lack of overall SNAP redemption at farmers markets indicates that additional barriers beyond monetary incentives may be dissuading people living with low incomes from shopping at farmers markets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markets with community partnerships may view nutrition education and consumer outreach as integral to their partnership activities, and these partnerships may also provide the market with resources for educational activities. Other studies have demonstrated that both SNAP-oriented programming and overt linkage with SNAP and WIC programs increase SNAP participants' purchases at farmers' markets, suggesting that these interlinked factors have the potential to substantially impact EBT sales (13,24) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These activities engage customers and teach how to use produce that may be unfamiliar. New knowledge also increases the likelihood of low-income shoppers spending their limited food dollars on farmers' market produce and supports the likelihood of new market consumers becoming return shoppers (24,39) .…”
Section: Supplemental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation