The last decades of the 20 th century saw the development of intense research programs directed toward the reduction of low-trauma fracture risk by the use of preventative medications. It is not the intention here to recite the history of these efforts, as these have been amply described elsewhere. After the turn of the century, it became apparent that the introduction of the bisphosphonate medications for the purpose was associated with a number of unfortunate consequences. Among these number the appearance of unanticipated necrosis of the mandible and/or maxilla and similarly unanticipated (or almost unanticipated) spontaneous fractures of the subtrochanteric femur. There followed a vigorous response by the medical community to these cataclysmic events. This response was exemplified by the convening, after a number of years of case-reports multiplying in the literature, by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, of select groups of concerned physicians and scientists tasked with evaluating the origins of these problems.At no time did these so-called Task Forces acknowledge clearly and unambiguously that the preponderance of evidence was consistent with the cause of these dramatic effects being the associated use of the bisphosphonate drugs. The purpose of this opinion paper is to show that the problem of assigning causation, a conundrum which has resulted in contrary opinions of many eminent philosophers, has indeed been convincingly elucidated in a manner that has received acceptance and recognition in the field of applied medicine, and furthermore, to show the application of this technique to the question of the causation of the effects "associated" with the bisphosphonates, with particular reference to the femur fractures mentioned above.