2004
DOI: 10.1021/la0498861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evanescent-Field-Driven Self-Assembled Molecular Photoswitch for Macrocycle Coordination and Release

Abstract: Two self-assembled monolayer (SAM) films containing the photoswitchable 4-pyridylazophenoxy chromophore have been deposited onto a gold-coated glass substrate. One film contains the chromophore as a single component, 1 SAM, and the other is doped with a nonphotoactive component as a 1:1 mixture, 2 SAM. The reversible photoswitching performances of 1 SAM and 2 SAM via the evanescence field using light of appropriate wavelengths have been investigated by UV spectroscopic and electrochemical monitoring. In princi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has generated some questions about the role of steric hindrance in the cis ↔ trans conversion within a monolayer film [910]. If the film is close-packed, there is some evidence that the conversion is restricted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work has generated some questions about the role of steric hindrance in the cis ↔ trans conversion within a monolayer film [910]. If the film is close-packed, there is some evidence that the conversion is restricted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to the function of such systems are changes in the inter- and intramolecular forces accompanying the transitions. In particular, by virtue of packing into a self-assembled film, steric constraints on the cis ↔ trans conversion, which do not exist in the isolated molecule or bulk disordered films, could dominate the switching [910]. Strictly, this steric hindrance requires close packing, thus some slight disorder in the film could be an enabling condition for the isomerization [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise reasons for these effects are still under debate. Originally, this was predominantly attributed to the close-packed arrangement of the azobenzene units in the SAM, which impedes trans-cis photoisomerization by steric constrains 22,23 . Another explanation is the electronic quenching of the isomerization, caused by alternative pathways for the deexcitation of the optical excited electronic state, which compete with the photoisomerization reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] To use azobenzene switches in SAMs at metal surfaces, it is of importance to decouple individual chromophores from the surface but also from other, neighbouring adsorbates. Otherwise, rapid quenching of photoexcited species by electronic coupling to the metal, steric hindrance by mechanical coupling to neighbours during isomerization, 9,10 or exciton transfer to neighbour molecules by lateral dipole coupling, 11 all tend to suppress switching. Indeed, switching of azobenzenes in densely packed SAMs is often unsuccessful, even when electronic coupling to the surface was minimized by attaching them to isolating linker groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%