An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?

Burmaoğlu, Serhat; Sarıtas, Ozcan

doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03014-1

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This type of societies is supported by the intensive use of knowledge in a scenario where industry plays an important role as a producer of publications and patents (Ciarli et al, 2016;Coad, 2019;Coad et al, 2016). The transformation of a country's capabilities in techno-scientific matters is directly related to the articulation of efforts by the actors to promote innovative initiatives based on knowledge (Burmaoglu and Saritas, 2019;Thoma, 2020). The evolutionary process that a country and a region requires to progress is not only complex but also demands various stages of development that need a high level of management capacity to articulate initiatives that seek the sustainable development of their societies (Kim, 2001(Kim, , 2003; this means that a solid socio-institutional fabric must be built to develop R&D þ i capabilities that can take between 20 and 30 years if the process is sustained (Banks et al, 2016;Carayannis et al, 2018;Leydesdorff, 2017Leydesdorff, , 2018Leydesdorff and Ivanova, 2016).…”

Section: Management Of Techno-scientific Systems Based On the Triple ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Another aspect, associated with the previous one, is found in the limited capacity of the small techno-scientific worlds for absorbing knowledge because they have insufficient critical mass that can be, at least, an interlocutor of the great changes that are taking place (Barnard et al. , 2012; Burmaoglu and Saritas, 2019; Zheng and Kouwenberg, 2019). This kind of analysis allows examining the type of scientific networks that operate between big and small worlds.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bibliometric mapping of techno-scientific systems of small Latin American worlds

Vega

Amorin

2022

IJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the evolution of the scientific production of Costa Rica and Panama, from Central America and Paraguay and Uruguay, from South America in the period 2000–2018. To achieve this, first, a bibliometric mapping was performed using the Web of Science (WoS) database. Second, the triple helix model was used to determine whether there are similar patterns or marked differences in the distribution of this type of publications in the helices of government, academia and industry. Design/methodology/approach The steps followed in this study were as follows: design and application of an algorithm to perform WoS downloads; download the publications using the country descriptor; process data using R and VOSviewer; design of a profile of the selected countries based on indicators; and use of the triple helix model to determine the weight of the scientific production. Findings The data found corroborate that the small technoscientific worlds examined do not have the minimum Science & Technology personnel nor the capabilities in infrastructure and technological equipment, and that expenditure in this area is minimal and for these reasons, the production in the WoS is low. Originality/value Studying the small technoscientific worlds from a bibliometric perspective allows generating inputs to diagnose the state of these countries in this area, as no evidence of similar studies in these countries was found in Scopus or the WoS. Likewise, examining scientific production from the triple helix model makes it possible to identify the weaknesses of each actor, and the results can contribute to the design of better public policies.

show abstract

Section: Management Of Techno-scientific Systems Based On the Triple ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric mapping of techno-scientific systems of small Latin American worlds

Vega

Amorin

2022

IJIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From micro to macro perspectives, many studies have been put forward to try to understand the relational perspective and develop applicable models for innovation. These studies can be traced with three phrases as "technology policy," "science policy" and "innovation policy," retrospectively (Burmaoglu and Saritas, 2019). Frenken (2017) asserts that there are two mainstreams for the development of innovation policy.…”

Section: Science Technology and Innovation Policy Literature: From Theory To Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

IdeaChain: a conceptual proposal for blockchain-based STI policy development

Burmaoğlu

Sarıtas

Şeşen³

2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to discuss the possibility of setting up a platform for inclusive policymaking process drawing upon the blockchain concept. The study posits that blockchain also has great potentials in non-financial applications, such as in policymaking, where there is a need for bottom-up approaches with more decentralized, distributed and evidence-based processes. Design/methodology/approach The study makes use of an analogy-based creative design methodology. The design science paradigm has its roots in engineering and the sciences of the artificial (Simon, 1996). As a problem-solving paradigm for solving complex engineering issues, design science seeks to create innovations that define the ideas, practices, technical capabilities and products through which the analysis, design, implementation and use of information systems can be effectively and efficiently accomplished. In the present study, the policy development theories and the logic of blockchain are synthesized to prepare a task model for the “IdeaChain” concept as a platform for creating, sharing and validating novel ideas as well as converting them into policies or new ventures through the funding mechanisms. Findings The IdeaChain concept is designed and demonstrated through its use in the domain of science, technology and innovation (STI) policy, which can be extended to cover all innovative activities linking the whole process from their emergence, funding, development, implementation and impact upon policy. Originality/value Blockchain is mostly discussed in literature with its impact on financial sector. IdeaChain is the first attempt to explore the potentials of blockchain in STI policymaking.

show abstract

“…Tamayo-Orbegozo et al developed a transferable and sustainable innovation solution model for regional innovation ecosystem [15]. Burmaoglu and Saritas analyzed the paradigm transformation of innovation ecosystem from the perspective of innovation policy [16]. Yin et al analyzed the innovation performance and sustainability of innovation ecosystem with the help of sustainable intelligent products [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Development of the Innovation Ecosystem from the Perspective of T‐O‐V

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The innovation ecosystem is a dynamic network system of competition and cooperation between entities and enterprises as the core in order to achieve value cocreation. Technology provides growth power for the innovation ecosystem, organization provides management support for the innovation ecosystem, and value has a guiding effect on the innovation ecosystem. From the perspective of technology-organization-value to study the sustainable development of the innovation ecosystem, build a system dynamics model, take the automotive industry innovation ecosystem as a research case, and find that technological elements have the most significant role in promoting innovation performance and organizational elements have a role in promoting economic benefits. Most notably, the coordinated adjustment of technological elements, organizational elements, and value elements is conducive to improving the innovation performance and economic benefits of the innovation ecosystem, and corresponding management measures are proposed from the dimensions of technology, organization, and value, which further promotes the sustainable development of the innovation ecosystem.

show abstract

An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?

Cited by 11 publications

References 67 publications

Bibliometric mapping of techno-scientific systems of small Latin American worlds

Bibliometric mapping of techno-scientific systems of small Latin American worlds

IdeaChain: a conceptual proposal for blockchain-based STI policy development

Sustainable Development of the Innovation Ecosystem from the Perspective of T‐O‐V

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About