2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39432-7_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Evolutionary Approach to Damage Recovery of Robot Motion with Muscles

Abstract: Abstract. Robots that can recover from damage did not exist outside science fiction. Here we describe a self-adaptive snake robot that uses shape memory alloy as muscles and an evolutionary algorithm as a method of adaptive control. Experiments demonstrate that if some of the robot's muscles are deliberately damaged, evolution is able to find new sequences of muscle activations that compensate, thus enabling the robot to recover its ability to move.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has previously been demonstrated on modular robots engaged in locomotion and self-reconfiguration [1], [2], [7], [24], [28]. For example, in a paper by Mahadavi and Bentley [16] the control of a snake like robot was optimized online using a genetic algorithm. The algorithm was shown to recover from failures in the SMAs actuating the robot.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has previously been demonstrated on modular robots engaged in locomotion and self-reconfiguration [1], [2], [7], [24], [28]. For example, in a paper by Mahadavi and Bentley [16] the control of a snake like robot was optimized online using a genetic algorithm. The algorithm was shown to recover from failures in the SMAs actuating the robot.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to the challenge of controller transferal, including adding noise to the simulated robot's sensors [32]; adding generic safety margins to the simulated objects comprising the physical system [26]; evolving directly on the physical system ( [23], [47] and [59]); evolving first in simulation followed by further adaptation on the physical robot ( [47], [51]); or implementing some neural plasticity that allows the physical robot to adapt during its lifetime to novel environments ( [19], [24], [60]). …”
Section: Application 3: Evolutionary Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this limitation, evolutionary optimization of gaits can be performed directly on the physical robot [64][65][66]. However, sequential evaluation of a population of gaits is not fitting for lifelong learning since it requires a steady convergence to a single gait.…”
Section: Adaptive Self-reconfigurable Modular Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%