2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ex-vivo model to determine dental pulp responses to heat and light-curing of dental restorative materials

Abstract: Experimental arrangements for assessing LCU performance that measure temperature increases using a thermocouple device on a laboratory bench should no longer be used. Future studies in this area should include replication of the clinical environment using greater sophistication, such as the use of an ex-vivo tooth slice model as described here. Temperature increases of 5.5 °C or more for 40 s caused an immediate decrease in cell number, which supports previous findings. However, complex interactions at an immu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermal stimulants may result in greater temperature increase in clinical settings where the pulpal blood flow does not dissipate effectively [25, 26]. Further investigation of the effect of different water coolant port designs could employ another novel method using tooth slices to analyse the response of the pulpal irrigation [27]. In future studies, a better pulpal simulation experimental set up would be helpful to find the exact temperature change during the tooth preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal stimulants may result in greater temperature increase in clinical settings where the pulpal blood flow does not dissipate effectively [25, 26]. Further investigation of the effect of different water coolant port designs could employ another novel method using tooth slices to analyse the response of the pulpal irrigation [27]. In future studies, a better pulpal simulation experimental set up would be helpful to find the exact temperature change during the tooth preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although JET15, similar to JET30, did not cause radial atomization originating from the coolant and drill interaction, from a thermal point of view (mean temperature increase of 6.02 °C with a maximum increase of 6.9 °C), it was clear that JET15 could not be recommended. The accepted thermal threshold for pulp tissue, to prevent pulpal necrosis, is an increase of 5.5 °C [ 21 , 24 , 29 32 ]. Temperature increases of 6 °C or more made heat shock protein 70 immediately detectable [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accepted thermal threshold for pulp tissue, to prevent pulpal necrosis, is an increase of 5.5 °C [ 21 , 24 , 29 32 ]. Temperature increases of 6 °C or more made heat shock protein 70 immediately detectable [ 32 ]. In addition, the reaction of the pulp greatly depends on the general condition of the pulp tissue [ 24 , 30 , 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations