2011
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2010.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An exact approach for relating recovering surgical patient workload to the master surgical schedule

Abstract: No other department influences the workload of a hospital more than the Department of Surgery and in particular, the activities in the operating room. These activities are governed by the master surgical schedule (MSS), which states which patient types receive surgery on which day. In this paper we describe an analytical approach to project the workload for downstream departments based on this MSS. Specifically the ward occupancy distributions, patient admission/discharge distributions, and the distributions f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the national or regional level, OR studies have influenced decisions on screening strategies (Koleva-Kolarova et al, 2015), cervical screening processes (Pilgrim and Chilcott, 2008) and funding of anti-cancer proposals (Hall et al, 1992). At the hospital or department level, OR studies have impacted brachytherapy delivery (Lee & Zaider, 2008), surgical schedules (Vanberkel et al, 2011), chemotherapy booking practices and schedules (Santibáñez et al, 2012), nurse hiring and shift start times and cancer treatment centre capacity, layout and scheduling processes (Matta & Patterson, 2007). Additionally, Simon (2009) developed a treatment decision aid that is accessible online.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the national or regional level, OR studies have influenced decisions on screening strategies (Koleva-Kolarova et al, 2015), cervical screening processes (Pilgrim and Chilcott, 2008) and funding of anti-cancer proposals (Hall et al, 1992). At the hospital or department level, OR studies have impacted brachytherapy delivery (Lee & Zaider, 2008), surgical schedules (Vanberkel et al, 2011), chemotherapy booking practices and schedules (Santibáñez et al, 2012), nurse hiring and shift start times and cancer treatment centre capacity, layout and scheduling processes (Matta & Patterson, 2007). Additionally, Simon (2009) developed a treatment decision aid that is accessible online.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their case study, optimising the schedules of plastic and oncologic surgeons, succeeded in increasing the number of sessions when teams of two surgeons were available for breast cancer surgery by 94%. Vanberkel et al (2011), on the other hand, compare surgical block schedules, that is, which blocks of operating room time are assigned to different specialties. They use an analytic approach involving queuing theory to output the workload in different wards created by patients recovering from surgery.…”
Section: Performance Of Cancer Treatment Centresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacity allocation decisions in surgical care services impact the performance of downstream inpatient care services [31,33,49,84,130,336,403,491,492,493]. Variability in bed utilization and staff requirements can be decreased by incorporating information about the required inpatient beds for surgical cases in allocating surgical capacity [4,31,33,217,428,487,488].…”
Section: Tactical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods: computer simulation [57,140,143,144,307,396,533], heuristics [31,32,33,462,501], Markov processes [196,492,493,536] Temporary capacity change. Available resource capacity could be temporarily changed in response to fluctuations in demand [334].…”
Section: Tactical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation