2006
DOI: 10.1300/j050v16n02_05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Influences and Factors on the Institutional Selection Processes of Freshmen Student-Athletes at Small Colleges and Universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, females were slightly more focused on academic factors. These results paralleled both the findings of Gabert et al (1999) and Goss et al (2006), who found that academic factors had a greater influence for female student-athletes. Coaches of female track and field teams may want to involve academic components as they are recruiting student-athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, females were slightly more focused on academic factors. These results paralleled both the findings of Gabert et al (1999) and Goss et al (2006), who found that academic factors had a greater influence for female student-athletes. Coaches of female track and field teams may want to involve academic components as they are recruiting student-athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also notable was that of the top five factors, only two out of the five were related to athletic participation. Similarly, Goss et al (2006) found that slight gender differences existed in the top factors influencing the college choice decision. Among the top five factors noted with males and females, males chose the most important factor as head coach while females chose degree programs.…”
Section: Identified College Selection Factors Among Student-athletesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In an examination of factors influencing small-college student athletes' institutional choices, Goss, Jubenville, and Orejan (2006) found that influence was derived from a combination of athletic, academic, and campus-related influences, and that personnel could best recruit student athletes with strategies that incorporated amenities, public relations, and academics, thereby producing a distinctive brand that can be used as a platform on which relationships with prospective student athletes can be built. According to Judson, Gorchels, and Aurand (2006), the benefits of a distinctive brand that is well understood by a coaching staff and incorporated in its daily activities are boundless, and the concept of coaches become living embodiments of the university's brand may be closer to reality than many universities envision.…”
Section: Relationship Marketing and Brand-buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, there exists an abundance of anecdotal sport stories and news articles about recruiting in US college athletics. Yet, relative to the scholarly literature, minimal attention has been paid to recruiting in a sport context (e.g., Doyle & Gaeth, 1990;Goss, Jubenville, & Orejan, 2006;Judson, James, & Aurand, 2005;Treme, Burrus, & Sherrick, 2011), especially as it pertains to the role of recruiters. Consequently, there is a need to more thoroughly understand the underlying mechanisms that enable certain recruiters to transcend physical characteristics and have their actions more positively received (regardless of the situation), thereby improving their recruitment effectiveness.…”
Section: Overview Of Recruitment Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%