2016
DOI: 10.15516/cje.v18i4.1845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Lecturers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Perceptions at the Faculty of Education in EMU in Cyprus / Istraživanje o procjeni pedagoškog i predmetnog tehnološkog znanja predavača na Učiteljskom fakultetu Istočnog mediteransko

Abstract: The use of technology in instruction has brought about different perceptions. The need to know how teachers integrate technology in instruction has brought about different views. Therefore, this study mainly seeks to understand these views on lecturers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) perceptions, as it examines how their views differ according to gender, employment status, department and the state of in-service training oriented towards the use of technology. In order to achieve the above … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nature of employment (whether full-time or part-time) also dictates the support needs (Beaton and Gilbert 2013). Studies in relation to TPACK on this regard are few and point to contrary findings (Chukwuemeka and Iscioglu 2017;Voithofer et al 2019 current study investigates the TPACK scores of lecturers in a dual-nature institution and will explore how these scores relate to the design of learning activities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nature of employment (whether full-time or part-time) also dictates the support needs (Beaton and Gilbert 2013). Studies in relation to TPACK on this regard are few and point to contrary findings (Chukwuemeka and Iscioglu 2017;Voithofer et al 2019 current study investigates the TPACK scores of lecturers in a dual-nature institution and will explore how these scores relate to the design of learning activities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Their subject-to-item ratio was good (15:1; Hair et al, 2015), which allowed them to conduct CFA and structural equation modeling (SEM) studies with their samples. Other studies using higher education faculty suffered from low sample-to-item ratios, from a low of 1.83:1 (Chukwuemeka & Iscioglu, 2017) to a high of 4.06:1 (Rienties et al, 2013). These studies did not allow for factor analysis due to low sample size.…”
Section: Brief Tpack Instrumentation Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, information and communication technologies have gained more positive impact on educational development of students and teachers around the globe. The focus is on ways in which technology can be used to support instructional delivery as well as students' achievement in education (Gambari, Ezenwa & Anyanwu, 2014;Chukwuemeka & Iscioglu, 2016;Idowu & Odewumi, 2017). In support of this, Onasanya, Fakomogbon, Sheu, and Soetan, (2010) maintained that it has become crucial that teaching and learning process should be given priority through to the utilization of various emerging technology platforms as they play significant role in the advancement of knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%