2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of message-relevant affect in road safety messages: Should road safety advertisements aim to make us feel good or bad?

Abstract: Drawing upon the multiple roles of affect posited by Elaboration Likelihood Model, the current paper examines the effectiveness of message-relevant affect. Specifically, humorous and fearevoking anti-drink driving messages are examined in terms of perceptions of relative influence on self and others (i.e., the third-person effect) and their performance on a range of persuasion outcomes. The influence of involvement, response efficacy, and gender on persuasion outcomes is also examined. Participants (N = 201) v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
89
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
89
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 August 2014334 http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2014 likelihood of message influence on the self and those closest (self and family (88%)), and other supporting voters (91%) than on the others (uncertain voters (76%), opposition supporters (78%)). These findings support the earlier research on "reverse" third-person effect or first-person effect, that message desirability plays a key role in persuasion and positive influence on self and others (Duck et al, 1995;Day, 2006;Lewis, Watson & Tay, 2007;Spinda, 2009;Lewis, Watson, & White, 2008). The study indicates that the BN respondents display a high confidence in predicting the influence of the BN political communication devices on self, others, and distant others.…”
Section: Discussion On the Findings Of The Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…4 August 2014334 http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2014 likelihood of message influence on the self and those closest (self and family (88%)), and other supporting voters (91%) than on the others (uncertain voters (76%), opposition supporters (78%)). These findings support the earlier research on "reverse" third-person effect or first-person effect, that message desirability plays a key role in persuasion and positive influence on self and others (Duck et al, 1995;Day, 2006;Lewis, Watson & Tay, 2007;Spinda, 2009;Lewis, Watson, & White, 2008). The study indicates that the BN respondents display a high confidence in predicting the influence of the BN political communication devices on self, others, and distant others.…”
Section: Discussion On the Findings Of The Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Along with these general indications that the ELM precedes the TPB, there are specific assertions about how the independent variables of the two theories may connect, such as the extent to which involvement (Lewis et al, 2008;, strong arguments and sufficient time to read material (aiding ability to process) are associated with more positive attitudes (Hill et al, 2007).…”
Section: (Insert Figure 3 About Here)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the topic of alcohol, TPE of beer commercials that encourage alcohol consumption (Lambe & McLeod, 2005, pp. 281-282) or affects like humorous and fear-evoking anti-drink driving messages (Lewis, Watson, & White, 2008) are studied. A conclusion from the latter being that content context (media type) is most relevant for TPE and behavioral consequences in relation to whom this significant "other" is (Lambe & McLeod, 2005, p. 290).…”
Section: General Support Of Occurrence Of Tpe Among Children Is Not Tmentioning
confidence: 99%