2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2009.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of minimum tick sizes on the Tokyo Stock Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further analyzed the cross-sectional idiosyncratic attributes of trading activity, competition, and information structure documented in McInish and Van Ness (2002) and Ascioglu, Comerton-Forde, and McInish (2010) using regression analysis on the effect of reduced tick size as follows: George, Kaul, and Nimalendran (1991); HS represents Huang and Stoll (1997); and MRR represents Madhavan, Richardson, and Roomans (1997). The percentage changes in the time-series average order-processing component are regressed on the ratio of the new tick size to the original tick size (Ratio), the natural log of the time-series average stock price (LogPrice pre ), the natural log of the time-series average daily number of trades (LogANumtrade pre ), the natural log of the time-series average daily mean trade size (LogATrsize pre ), the inverse of the time-series average standard deviation of returns (1/stdev pre ), and the natural log of turnover (LogTurnover pre ), which were all estimated using data from the 3 months prior to the tick-size conversion.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further analyzed the cross-sectional idiosyncratic attributes of trading activity, competition, and information structure documented in McInish and Van Ness (2002) and Ascioglu, Comerton-Forde, and McInish (2010) using regression analysis on the effect of reduced tick size as follows: George, Kaul, and Nimalendran (1991); HS represents Huang and Stoll (1997); and MRR represents Madhavan, Richardson, and Roomans (1997). The percentage changes in the time-series average order-processing component are regressed on the ratio of the new tick size to the original tick size (Ratio), the natural log of the time-series average stock price (LogPrice pre ), the natural log of the time-series average daily number of trades (LogANumtrade pre ), the natural log of the time-series average daily mean trade size (LogATrsize pre ), the inverse of the time-series average standard deviation of returns (1/stdev pre ), and the natural log of turnover (LogTurnover pre ), which were all estimated using data from the 3 months prior to the tick-size conversion.…”
Section: Cross-sectional Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ascioglu, Comerton-Forde, and McInish (2010) examined the different tick sizes in the Tokyo Stock Exchange, which are based on stock prices solely. They suggested that the tick size should be determined by trading activity and stock price, and posited that transaction costs would be unnecessarily high if the minimum tick size is set inadequately.…”
Section: 122mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the spread is attributed to liquidity and transparency of the market, that is, more liquidity and transparency in the market decrease the bid-ask spreads. Ascioglu, et al (2010) argue that higher minimum tick size would generate high unnecessarily transactions costs. While lower minimum tick size may lead to low market liquidity.…”
Section: Rules Of Tick Size and Spreadmentioning
confidence: 99%