2008
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises for Children with Velopharyngeal Inadequacy

Abstract: The velopharyngeal closure mechanism is the articulator that separates the oral and nasal cavities during speech and swallowing. Articulation and resonance may be adversely affected if velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) is present. VPI is generally corrected through surgery or speech prosthetics. There is, however, a small subset of clients who may improve with treatment using muscle rehabilitation procedures that are task specific to speech. Nonspeech oral motor exercise treatment has been used but found ineffec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, these exercises were found to be ineffective. [14][15][16][17] Later research showed significant differences in the velopharyngeal closure patterns of speech and nonspeech activities, suggesting that nonspeech ''exercises'' could not possibly be effective in improving velopharyngeal function for speech. [18][19][20][21][22] In addition, patients with a history of cleft rarely have a weakness of the musculature.…”
Section: What Not To Domentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] However, these exercises were found to be ineffective. [14][15][16][17] Later research showed significant differences in the velopharyngeal closure patterns of speech and nonspeech activities, suggesting that nonspeech ''exercises'' could not possibly be effective in improving velopharyngeal function for speech. [18][19][20][21][22] In addition, patients with a history of cleft rarely have a weakness of the musculature.…”
Section: What Not To Domentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These and other studies are reviewed in greater detail in Lass and Pannbacker 46 and Ruscello. 47 Limitations of Strength Training Evidence An important issue common to the each of the studies just mentioned is that it is unclear from the methodologies used whether strength training actually took place. That is, specific strategies for overload and progression were not specified, nor were pre-or post-treatment measures of orofacial strength reported.…”
Section: Lower Levels Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although it might be expected that many muscle groups active during speech may be strengthened for sucking/ blowing movements (empirical evidence of strength gains is currently not available), carryover to speech movements would be expected to be less than if speech movements were exercised. 47…”
Section: Strength Training Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruscello35 addressed the issue of speech therapy for improving velopharyngeal closure. This review article described a variety of techniques including experimental approaches with CPAP and biofeedback, but the primary emphasis was on the use of “oral-motor therapy,” labeled as NSOME (nonspeech oral motor exercises), such as blowing, sucking massage, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%