Proceedings of the 2013 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 2013
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611972832.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Examination of Practical Granger Causality Inference

Abstract: Learning temporal causal structures among multiple time series is one of the major tasks in mining time series data. Granger causality is one of the most popular techniques in uncovering the temporal dependencies among time series; however it faces two main challenges: (i) the spurious effect of unobserved time series and (ii) the computational challenges in high dimensional settings. In this paper, we utilize the confounder path delays to find a subset of time series that via conditioning on them we are able … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14], variables which mediate the impact of an action on the outcome are identified to reduce the bias in assessing the causal effect for online advertising. [5] exploits confounder path delays in an attempt to cancel out the spurious confounder effect. However, a principled solution to this problem remains elusive.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [14], variables which mediate the impact of an action on the outcome are identified to reduce the bias in assessing the causal effect for online advertising. [5] exploits confounder path delays in an attempt to cancel out the spurious confounder effect. However, a principled solution to this problem remains elusive.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the original Granger causality test was designed for two time series, several methods [2,18,17] have been proposed to analyze time series data involving many features and to learn a causal graph structure. Following the work [2], [20] detects causality of spatial time series, [18] proposes to use hidden Markov Random Field method, [17] handles extreme values in time series, [4] detects Granger causality from irregular time series, and [5] presents Copula-Granger method to efficiently capture non-linearity in the data. Learning temporal causal graph has been applied to biology applications [25], climate analysis [9], microbiology [19], fMRI data analysis [24], anomaly detection [23], and longitudinal analysis [26].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, time series X is said to cause time series Y, if it can be proved that time series X provide statistically significant info rmat ion about the future values of t ime series Y, than Y alone [21] series X will have a statistically significant correlat ion with time series Y. It tested whether Twitter sentiments (pos, and neg) has a causative effect ("Granger causal") on the movement of the stock market Index.…”
Section: Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear methods enable us to use some of the simplest concepts from time-series analysis to begin to scratch the surface of this difficult identification-and-quantitative-estimation problem in settings where data availability is lean and data quality is low. We can consider Granger causality testing as applied to the niche-construction context in a minimalist dynamic linear system of regression equations (nonparametric and nonlinear versions can be found in Diks and Panchenko (2006) and Bahadori and Liu (2013). We restrict ourselves to linear vector autoregressive systems as a workable approximation (at the initial stage where the frequency of the LP t allele is close to zero), but we point out that a variable such as allele frequency, LP t , lies in the interval [0,1], so clearly, we must use a general nonlinear Granger causality approach that respects this basic nonlinearity 2 in a more realistic approach.…”
Section: Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1b) can be done using the methods of Diks and Panchenko (2006) and Bahadori and Liu (2013). Lee et al (1993) discuss testing for the presence of neglected nonlinearity.…”
Section: Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%