2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-015-9566-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of some of the cognitive and motivation variables related to gender differences in lecture note-taking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Another potential explanation is motivation and gender. 20 In one study, results indicated that females recorded significantly more information in notes than males and performed significantly better on measures of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension, and conscientiousness. 18 Within the current study each group was balanced in gender but it does not rule out hand-writing speed, working memory, or personality.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 Another potential explanation is motivation and gender. 20 In one study, results indicated that females recorded significantly more information in notes than males and performed significantly better on measures of handwriting speed, working memory, language comprehension, and conscientiousness. 18 Within the current study each group was balanced in gender but it does not rule out hand-writing speed, working memory, or personality.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When studying memory and retention, it is important to examine both immediate and delayed testing because improvements in performance due to an educational intervention can sometimes be seen in delayed tests rather than immediate tests. 20 The delayed test also represents a more realistic classroom setting. Immediate test performance or perceptions of the usefulness of recorded lectures are outcomes that are often studied but have limited utility in a practical setting.…”
Section: A J P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, it was claimed that female students recorded more important ideas than the male students, yet they were less successful than the male students (Hartley, 1976;Daly, 1983). However, in many studies (Reddington et al, 2015;Morehead et al, 2019), it was revealed that females took notes more effectively than males. On the other hand, there are also some studies (Rahmani and Sadeghi, 2011;White, 2017) suggesting that there are no significant differences between female and male students with regard to note taking success.…”
Section: öZçakmak 587mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciocca et al (2015) regarded job involvement as a worker's willingness and acceptance of current work. Reddington, Peverly, & Block (2015) pointed it out as the performance of work attitudes and divided job involvement into individual and group dimensions. Shen & Jiang (2015) stated that job involvement was individual self-dignity for the identity of the work content and work performance.…”
Section: Job Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%