2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-010-0190-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the effects of perceived difficulty of manufacturing the extension product on brand extension attitudes

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between extension difficulty, defined as the perceived difficulty of manufacturing the extension product, and attitudes toward brand extensions. Although extant literature has hitherto modeled this relationship as a simple monotonic relationship, a study by Bottomley and Holden (Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4):494-500, 2001) has questioned its empirical generalizability. We suggest that the relationship between extension difficulty and extension attitudes may be far mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As customers enter the delight/disgust stages, will the moderating effects change? Mariadoss et al (2010) suggest that significant changes can be expected where the non-linear relationship that is being moderated is non-monotonic and changes direction, as illustrated by either a U-shaped or inverted relationship. Where the non-linear effect is only due to a single inflection point in the slope of the main effect in the same direction (as at the delight/disgust level), we do not a priori expect a significant interaction between the quadratic component of satisfaction, and relationship age/continuance commitment.…”
Section: Ejm 4710mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As customers enter the delight/disgust stages, will the moderating effects change? Mariadoss et al (2010) suggest that significant changes can be expected where the non-linear relationship that is being moderated is non-monotonic and changes direction, as illustrated by either a U-shaped or inverted relationship. Where the non-linear effect is only due to a single inflection point in the slope of the main effect in the same direction (as at the delight/disgust level), we do not a priori expect a significant interaction between the quadratic component of satisfaction, and relationship age/continuance commitment.…”
Section: Ejm 4710mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers employ brand extension strategies that include existing brand names to reduce the risks of new product introductions and generate further growth opportunities (Aaker and Keller 1990;Fedorikhin et al 2008;Keller 2008;Mariadoss et al 2010). Thus in 2009, brand extensions represented 93 % of all new product introductions in food and beverage categories and earned more than $7.5 billion in first-year US sales (Dolliver 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this study advances new product development literature by illustrating that the incremental utility from a new product depends on the form factor of the innovation (i.e. innovation locus ; Gill and Dube, 2007; Ma et al , 2015; Mariadoss et al , 2010). Additionally, to the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to connect two extant conceptual frameworks – the innovation locus and the complementarity/substitutability – and use these frameworks to further understand upward line extensions.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%