2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004840000049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phenological records from the UK

Abstract: This paper examines the mean flowering times of 11 plant species in the British Isles over a 58-year period, and the flowering times of a further 13 (and leafing time of an additional 1) for a reduced period of 20 years. Timings were compared to Central England temperatures and all 25 phenological events were significantly related (P<0.001 in all but 1 case) to temperature. These findings are discussed in relation to other published work. The conclusions drawn from this work are that timings of spring and summ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

30
264
6
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
30
264
6
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Flowering time tracking was calculated as the correlation between first flowering day and mean monthly temperature in January, April and May. This aggregate temperature has been found to be the best predictor of first flowering day in Concord , and similar measures have been used in several other temperate floras (Sparks et al 2000;Fitter & Fitter 2002;. In previous analyses, we examined several additional ecologically relevant traits to determine the most likely explanation for the pattern of species' change in abundance (Willis et al 2008(Willis et al , 2010.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowering time tracking was calculated as the correlation between first flowering day and mean monthly temperature in January, April and May. This aggregate temperature has been found to be the best predictor of first flowering day in Concord , and similar measures have been used in several other temperate floras (Sparks et al 2000;Fitter & Fitter 2002;. In previous analyses, we examined several additional ecologically relevant traits to determine the most likely explanation for the pattern of species' change in abundance (Willis et al 2008(Willis et al , 2010.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…degree-days) often predicts well the date of flowering in plants (e.g. Jackson 1966;Diekmann 1996), and flowering phenology commonly tracks interannual variation in air temperatures (Fitter et al 1995;Sparks et al 2000;Miller-Rushing et al 2007). Heat accumulation similarly affects development rate and, hence, the timing of appearance of adults, in many economically important insect species (Embree 1970;Kemp & Onsager 1986;Régnière et al 2007).…”
Section: (B) Photoperiodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could also be true for flowering phenology, as reproductive shoots were found to be less frost resistant than vegetative tissue (Ladinig, Hacker, Neuner, & Wagner, 2013). Advances in flowering phenology might, however, lead to increased fecundity if there is no mismatch with pollinating insects (Baeten, Sercu, Bonte, Vanhellemont, & Verheyen, 2015; Sparks, Jeffree, & Jeffree, 2000). Overall, studies confirmed that the performance and abundance of species with an advanced phenology increased, whereas the performance of the others decreased (Baeten et al., 2015; Cleland et al., 2012; Hulme, 2011; Willis, Ruhfel, Primack, Miller‐Rushing, & Davis, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%