2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours

Abstract: This article extends social psychological research on the motivations for sustainable consumption from the predominant domain of ecologically conscious consumer behaviour to socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. A UK-based survey study examines relationships between socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours and Schwartz's value types, personal and socio-political materialism, and demographics among the general public. Socially conscious consumer behaviour, like its ecological counterpart, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
280
0
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
18
280
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…They have also found a negative correlation between preferences for Fairtrade certified products and conservation values (Doran, 2009(Doran, , 2010Grankvist & Kajonius, 2015). Similar correlations have been found for the preference for the broader (although related) construct of socially conscious purchasing (Pepper, Jackson, & Uzzell, 2009). Ladhari & Tchetgna (2015) used Rokeach's value model (Rokeach, 1973) to study the influence of personal values on fair trade consumption.…”
Section: Valuessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…They have also found a negative correlation between preferences for Fairtrade certified products and conservation values (Doran, 2009(Doran, , 2010Grankvist & Kajonius, 2015). Similar correlations have been found for the preference for the broader (although related) construct of socially conscious purchasing (Pepper, Jackson, & Uzzell, 2009). Ladhari & Tchetgna (2015) used Rokeach's value model (Rokeach, 1973) to study the influence of personal values on fair trade consumption.…”
Section: Valuessupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Results were used to verify two assumptions, based largely on previous studies on the value antecedents of (self-reported) proenvironmental behaviour (cf. Grunert and Jørn Juhl, 1995;Gutierrez Karp, 1996;Krystallis et al, 2008;Pepper et al, 2009;Shaw et al, 2005;Stern and Dietz, 1994;Thøgersen and € Olander, 2002): a) Consumers engaging in collaborative consumption score higher on self-transcendence values (and, in particular, universalism) and openness to change values. b) Consumers engaging in collaborative consumption score lower on self-enhancement and conservation values.…”
Section: Quantitative Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a materialistic world view is apparently contradictory to sustainability. Pepper et al (2009) pointed out the negative relationship between personal materialism and socially conscious purchasing. Further research should concentrate on identifying how to trigger a change in values towards postmaterialism and reaching a consensus on reflexive modernization in developing countries, which will prevent severe alienation and ecological disasters and promote socially conscious consumer cultures.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%