Proceedings of the International Workshop on Formalization of Modeling Languages 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1943397.1943400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An executable semantics for UML 2 activity diagrams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stating a concise and comprehensible formalism, activity diagrams combine advantages of an interaction and a control oriented view as confirmed in the comparison of the LAD model of a power window [4] with a scenario-based model [5]. As a future work, we aim at introducing a formal verification based approach allowing for the detection of violating behavior within an LAD model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stating a concise and comprehensible formalism, activity diagrams combine advantages of an interaction and a control oriented view as confirmed in the comparison of the LAD model of a power window [4] with a scenario-based model [5]. As a future work, we aim at introducing a formal verification based approach allowing for the detection of violating behavior within an LAD model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our extensions for executability are motivated by an automotive power window case study [4]. The power window system takes control of the four passenger windows of a car.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these approaches are similar to our token and step concepts, nondeterministic pattern matching, failure as a branching condition, as well as variable binding are not considered directly in the case of activity diagrams (as Petri-nets are also missing analogous concepts). Moreover, the formalisms of [9,13] do not involve GraTra concepts (even if an encoding into GraTra would be possible). An analysis of activity diagrams based on GraTra has been proposed in [12] involving an object flow concept and a rule-based semantics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executable UML [8] aims at defining behavioral specification precise enough to be executed via the fUML execution engine [3]. It is based on a limited subset of UML comprising class diagrams, state charts, and activity diagrams (ADs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%