2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experiment on heat extraction from a deep geothermal well using a downhole coaxial open loop design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were followed by finite volume methods (FVM) with 18.4%, while the remaining 21.1% of the studies did not report the methods used. CCLGS --Bu et al [30] CCLGS FVM -Focaccia and Tinti [31] CCLGS --Yekoladio et al [32] CCLGS --Templeton et al [33] CCLGS FEM FlexPDE Wight and Bennett [34] CCLGS --Le Lous et al [35] CCLGS FEM FFEFLOW Noorollahi et al [36] CCLGS FVM Ansys Alimonti and Soldo [37] CCLGS --Mokhtari et al [38] CCLGS --Caulk and Tomak [39] CCLGS FEM Comsol Sun et al [40] CCLGS-H FDM -Song et al [25] CCLGS FDM -Shi et al [41] CCLGS FEM Comsol Renaud et al [42] CCLGS FVM Ansys Ghoreishi-Madiseh et al [43] CCLGS FVM Ansys Zhang et al [44] CCLGS FEM Comsol Sun et al [45] CCLGS-H FDM -Wang et al [46] CCLGS-H FDM -Yu et al [47] CCLGS FDM -Yildirim et al [48] CCLGS FEM Comsol Dai et al [49] CCLGS FVM -Hu et al [50] CCLGS FEM Comsol Wang et al [51] CCLGS-H FEM Comsol Hu et al [52] CCLGS FVM T2Well Kalmár et al [53] CCLGS FDM -He et al [54] CCLGS _ -Wang et al [26] CCLGS-H FEM Comsol Wang et al [55] CCLGS-H FEM Comsol Pokhrel et al [56] CCLGS FVM Ansys Sun et al [57] UCLGS FDM -Sun et al [58] UCLGS FDM -Yuan et al [59] UCLGS FDM -Ghavidel et al [60] UCLGS FEM Comsol Fallah et al [61] UCLGS FDM -Zhang et al [62] UCLGS FDM -Note: CCLGS-H-Horizontal CCLGS.…”
Section: Clgss Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were followed by finite volume methods (FVM) with 18.4%, while the remaining 21.1% of the studies did not report the methods used. CCLGS --Bu et al [30] CCLGS FVM -Focaccia and Tinti [31] CCLGS --Yekoladio et al [32] CCLGS --Templeton et al [33] CCLGS FEM FlexPDE Wight and Bennett [34] CCLGS --Le Lous et al [35] CCLGS FEM FFEFLOW Noorollahi et al [36] CCLGS FVM Ansys Alimonti and Soldo [37] CCLGS --Mokhtari et al [38] CCLGS --Caulk and Tomak [39] CCLGS FEM Comsol Sun et al [40] CCLGS-H FDM -Song et al [25] CCLGS FDM -Shi et al [41] CCLGS FEM Comsol Renaud et al [42] CCLGS FVM Ansys Ghoreishi-Madiseh et al [43] CCLGS FVM Ansys Zhang et al [44] CCLGS FEM Comsol Sun et al [45] CCLGS-H FDM -Wang et al [46] CCLGS-H FDM -Yu et al [47] CCLGS FDM -Yildirim et al [48] CCLGS FEM Comsol Dai et al [49] CCLGS FVM -Hu et al [50] CCLGS FEM Comsol Wang et al [51] CCLGS-H FEM Comsol Hu et al [52] CCLGS FVM T2Well Kalmár et al [53] CCLGS FDM -He et al [54] CCLGS _ -Wang et al [26] CCLGS-H FEM Comsol Wang et al [55] CCLGS-H FEM Comsol Pokhrel et al [56] CCLGS FVM Ansys Sun et al [57] UCLGS FDM -Sun et al [58] UCLGS FDM -Yuan et al [59] UCLGS FDM -Ghavidel et al [60] UCLGS FEM Comsol Fallah et al [61] UCLGS FDM -Zhang et al [62] UCLGS FDM -Note: CCLGS-H-Horizontal CCLGS.…”
Section: Clgss Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As over 50% of the total cost of the geothermal project can be drilling costs [69], a good solution to reduce high drilling costs is presented by using depleted and abandoned gas and oil wells, which has been extensively investigated recently [70][71][72][73]. Depending on the obtained temperature in DBHE, these systems can be used for direct space heating [74,75], coupled with heat pumps [76][77][78], or even in power production systems [79].…”
Section: Vertical Heat Exchanger Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coaxial heat exchangers, see Figure A.6, promise to outperform their U-bend counterparts. For this reason, the study of coaxial heat exchangers has received serious attention (Holmberg et al, 2016;Gordon et al, 2018, Dai et al, 2019Iry and Rafee, 2019;Liu et al, 2019;Luo et al, 2019;Pan et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019;Cazorla-Marín et al, 2020, Hu et al, 2020. Potential reasons behind the better performance include: (i) a larger heat transfer surface area for a given borehole size, (ii) the fluid in the inner pipe is significantly more insulated from the ground and, thus, exchanges minimum heat with the ground, (iii) possibly less pressure (head) loss because of the larger (compared to its conventional U-bend counterpart) and potentially shorter (to deliver the same amount of heat from or to the ground) conduit.…”
Section: A5 Geothermal Heat Exchangermentioning
confidence: 99%