2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Analysis of Another Privacy

Abstract: The present article discusses how events outside a subject's skin and not accessible to another subject but to an experimenter may contribute to experimental analyses of private events. Of 16 undergraduates, 8, referred to as instructors, first learned conditional discriminations (i.e., 81 C1, 82C2, 83C3, and 84C4) in a standard matching-to-sample (MTS) task with the stimuli 8s as the samples and the stimuli Cs as the correct comparisons. Then the other 8 subjects, learners, were exposed to modified MTS trials… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is very similar to what happened in fact inOkouchi's (2006) experimental simulation of this framework, where, despite several complementary manipulations, some of the participants continuously relied only on the "public" stimulus throughout the experiment (see alsoSonoda & Okouchi, 2012).11 For a description of how similar problems were also inherited by Theory of Mind and Simulation theories, seeLeudar and Costall (2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…This is very similar to what happened in fact inOkouchi's (2006) experimental simulation of this framework, where, despite several complementary manipulations, some of the participants continuously relied only on the "public" stimulus throughout the experiment (see alsoSonoda & Okouchi, 2012).11 For a description of how similar problems were also inherited by Theory of Mind and Simulation theories, seeLeudar and Costall (2009).…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Sonoda and Okouchi (2012) have recently explored an experimental method for the analysis of such contingencies. In an earlier study, Okouchi (2006) distinguished between two definitions of private events for the purposes of an experimental analysis. Unconditional inaccessibility is a context in which an event is private with respect to a single observer, while conditional inaccessibility is a context in which an event is observable to a single observer and one other observer, but not by others.…”
Section: Contingency Horizon: Nonhuman and Human Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is undeniable that there are technical complications inherent in attempting to conduct FBAs with direct observations in the absence of observable environmental antecedent and consequent events, and to some extent this dilemma has impeded experimental analyses of aberrant behavior (see Okouchi, 2006, for a discussion of an experimental analysis of private events). However, this challenge should not interfere with continued attempts to develop more sophisticated strategies for identifying the contexts in which students are likely to exhibit their problems.…”
Section: Self-initiated Maladaptive Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%