2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental analysis of different Deep Learning based Models for Alzheimer’s Disease classification using Brain Magnetic Resonance Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provide the experimental results for one five-way benchmark multiclass classification problem [18], one four-way multiclass classification problem [33], and one three-way classification problem [45]. The suggested model's training efficiency was evaluated in terms of important parameters, i.e., training accuracy, validation accuracy, training loss, and validation loss at different epochs without dropout, with dropout, with dropout and weight decay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We provide the experimental results for one five-way benchmark multiclass classification problem [18], one four-way multiclass classification problem [33], and one three-way classification problem [45]. The suggested model's training efficiency was evaluated in terms of important parameters, i.e., training accuracy, validation accuracy, training loss, and validation loss at different epochs without dropout, with dropout, with dropout and weight decay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, the authors of [45] utilized different pre-trained models using a fine-tuned approach to transfer learning in the ADNI dataset for three-way AD classification (AD, MCI, and NC). The experimental results showed that DenseNet outperformed the others, achieving a maximal average accuracy of 99.05%.…”
Section: Proposed Randomized Concatenated Deep Features Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies with deep learning neural networks produced a maximum accuracy of 98.3% [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. As shown in [ 38 ], the authors used neural network modeling to verify performance, and their results showed that DenseNet-121 generated accuracy of 90.22%, which is higher than Inception-V1, V2, and Residual Networks [ 39 ]. A simple classification model based on a decision tree with hyperparameter tuning produced 99% accuracy [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN [ 43 ] and RNN [ 62 ] were used in two studies, with results of 96.66% and 81%, respectively. Three of the remaining studies compared multiple DL models [ 38 , 44 , 65 ], with accuracy ranging from 59.8% to 98.86%. Two studies were associated with both ML and DL classifiers [ 38 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several studies have been proposed for both AD-NC classification and MCI-to-AD prediction tasks using an iterative sparse and DL model [26], for classifying subjects into AD, MCI and NC classes using stacked denoising auto-encoders, 3D-CNNs, support vector machines (SVM), random forests, decision trees, and k-nearest neighbor classifiers [27], for AD subject classification using the gene subset from the DNA methylation dataset and enhanced deep recurrent neural network [28], for AD-NC classification using cerebral catheter angiogram neuroimages and a combination of inception version 3 and densenet201 architectures [29], as well as utilizing dysregulation patterns of miRNA biomarkers for the prediction of AD [30]. They also proposed methods for the classification of frontotemporal dementia, AD and NC using the MRI neuroimaging modality and DL models [31], a novel dense CNN network to differentiate among stable and progressive MCI classes using hippocampal morphometry [32], a U-Net styled DL architecture for AD-NC classification task from retinal vasculature images [33], an explainable 3D residual attention deep neural network (DNN) for AD-NC and progressive MCI-static MCI classification tasks [34], a multi-modal data platform architecture to implement regression tasks and to predict the progression of AD [35], as well as transfer learning models such as LeNet, AlexNet, VGG-16, VGG-19, Inception-V1, Inception-V2, Inception-V3, DenseNet-121, etc., for binary classification between NC, MCI and AD classes [36]. Similarly, research has been done to propose a deep separable CNN model along with AlexNet and GoogLeNet transfer learning based models for AD early diagnosis [37], aggregation of CNN with a deep neural network model for AD-NC classification task [38], gait-based cognitive screening and machine learning to differentiate among AD, MCI and NC classes [39], a variant of CNN for AD, NC, MCI, early MCI and late MCI classification [40], as well as an end-to-end framework comprising of CNNs and MRI scans for AD-NC binary and for multiclass tasks [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%