2012
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2011.653784
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental and computational analysis of primary cilia deflection under fluid flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both bending and pivoting could trigger membrane channels. Previous studies have used fluid flow to estimate primary cilium bending stiffness based on deformation profiles (11)(12)(13)(14), but the precise mechanical properties of the cilium remain unknown. It is likely that mechanosensation needs subtle coordination and calibration of the intracellular machinery involving adaptation and feedback mechanisms reacting to external stimuli, such as is the case in mammalian inner-ear cells, where active mechanical processes are crucial for hearing acuity (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both bending and pivoting could trigger membrane channels. Previous studies have used fluid flow to estimate primary cilium bending stiffness based on deformation profiles (11)(12)(13)(14), but the precise mechanical properties of the cilium remain unknown. It is likely that mechanosensation needs subtle coordination and calibration of the intracellular machinery involving adaptation and feedback mechanisms reacting to external stimuli, such as is the case in mammalian inner-ear cells, where active mechanical processes are crucial for hearing acuity (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful measurements by several groups (6,16,17,27,55) have measured the flexural rigidity EI for primary cilia and while there is incomplete agreement, reported values typically vary within the range 1 Â 10 À23 < EI < 2 Â 10 À23 Nm 2 . Thus, we set EI ¼ 1.5 Â 10 À23 Nm 2 here.…”
Section: Classical Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first computational models of cilia bending in response to fluid flow estimate a bending stiffness on the order of 10 -23 N×m 2 , two orders of magnitude lower than motile cilia, and demonstrate that longer cilia experience greater deflection and thus membrane strain [7,67]. A more recent computational model incorporates fluid drag and allows for rotation at the base of the cilium, claiming a flexural rigidity an order of magnitude greater (10 -22 N×m 2 ) than previous models [68]. This difference is likely due to the use of different cell lines and different fluid flow conditions between each study, and also suggests that the cilium may not have a rigid attachment to the cell body and experiences some degree of basal rotation in response to fluid flow.…”
Section: Primary Cilia Structure Dictates Mechanosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early electron micrographs of cilia structure actually suggest that cilia structure may not be constant along their length, and that cilia may lose microtubule symmetry and number towards the distal tip [71,72]. In fact, two of the described bending models also comment that cilia do not always appear to deflect with a constant curvature, potentially due to this lack of symmetry along the length of the cilium [67,68]. …”
Section: Primary Cilia Structure Dictates Mechanosensingmentioning
confidence: 99%