2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental and kinetic modeling study of the ignition delay characteristics of binary blends of ethane/propane and ethylene/propane in multiple shock tubes and rapid compression machines over a wide range of temperature, pressure, equivalence ratio, and dilution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it can be seen that the developed mechanism in the present work exhibits good performance for all of the studied combustion conditions. To show the overall different performances of the four mechanisms more specifically, statistical error analysis is carried out by calculating the standard deviation (σ), the mean absolute deviation (MAD), the mean square error (MSE), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between kinetic modeling results and experimental measurements using the following equations 43 , 44 In the above equations, n represents the total number of measured IDTs with a value of 93. Figure 3 shows the computed error analysis values using the four kinetic modeling results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it can be seen that the developed mechanism in the present work exhibits good performance for all of the studied combustion conditions. To show the overall different performances of the four mechanisms more specifically, statistical error analysis is carried out by calculating the standard deviation (σ), the mean absolute deviation (MAD), the mean square error (MSE), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between kinetic modeling results and experimental measurements using the following equations 43 , 44 In the above equations, n represents the total number of measured IDTs with a value of 93. Figure 3 shows the computed error analysis values using the four kinetic modeling results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to quantitatively evaluate the prediction accuracy of the employed seven kinetic mechanisms, statistical error analysis is performed by computing the following four error indicators, i.e., the standard deviation (σ), the mean absolute deviation (MAD), the mean square error (MSE), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) through equations (1)–(4) between the predicted IDTs (τ model ) and the experimental measurements (τ Exp ) [ 47 , 48 ]: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitted rate coefficients of the abstraction reactions are implemented in the hierarchical NUIGMech1.3 mechanism 41–43 by incorporating the sub‐mechanism of MCH with theoretical calculation of unimolecular reactions and following β‐scission reactions 8,9 . Kinetic modeling for IDTs is carried out via Cantera software 44 by using the closed homogeneous batch reactor at constant volume, which is confirmed to be accurate for ST IDT simulations from short test times 45,46 .…”
Section: Theoretical Computations and Kinetic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%