15th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 1997
DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-2290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental and numerical study of hypersonic turbulent boundary layer flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aided by preliminary computations, a cavity depth of 25 mm was chosen as the minimum to resolve as much as possible of the very steep flow gradients expected near the reattachment lip. The unit Reynolds number given in table 1 is the lowest feasible operating value for the tunnel but tests by Mallinson et al (1997b) showed that it should be sufficient to maintain laminar attached boundary layer flow up to a chord length of at least 400 mm. Knowledge of compressible free shear layer transition is incomplete, but various hypersonic cavity studies (for example Chapman, Kuehn & Larson 1958;Nicholl 1964;Larson & Keating 1960) have all suggested that the separated shear layer for a surface cavity is 'as stable as the corresponding attached laminar boundary layer'.…”
Section: Model Design Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aided by preliminary computations, a cavity depth of 25 mm was chosen as the minimum to resolve as much as possible of the very steep flow gradients expected near the reattachment lip. The unit Reynolds number given in table 1 is the lowest feasible operating value for the tunnel but tests by Mallinson et al (1997b) showed that it should be sufficient to maintain laminar attached boundary layer flow up to a chord length of at least 400 mm. Knowledge of compressible free shear layer transition is incomplete, but various hypersonic cavity studies (for example Chapman, Kuehn & Larson 1958;Nicholl 1964;Larson & Keating 1960) have all suggested that the separated shear layer for a surface cavity is 'as stable as the corresponding attached laminar boundary layer'.…”
Section: Model Design Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%