2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental assessment of friction effects in the split Hopkinson pressure bar using the ring compression test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is excessive friction, a barreling effect is observed, causing stress inhomogeneity and an increase in the measured specimen strength: such tests are not valid for the measurement of bulk properties of a material. Studies of different lubricants [47,92,93] have shown that paraffin wax, petroleum jelly, and molybdenum disulfide grease provide adequate lubrication for high strain rate experiments.…”
Section: Dynamic Loading: Split Hopkinson Pressure Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is excessive friction, a barreling effect is observed, causing stress inhomogeneity and an increase in the measured specimen strength: such tests are not valid for the measurement of bulk properties of a material. Studies of different lubricants [47,92,93] have shown that paraffin wax, petroleum jelly, and molybdenum disulfide grease provide adequate lubrication for high strain rate experiments.…”
Section: Dynamic Loading: Split Hopkinson Pressure Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous studies have been performed on this subject (Li and Meng 2003;Hartley et al 2007;Iwamoto and Yokoyama 2012). To examine this influence on the particle model, numerical dynamic tests were conducted on model D under different friction coefficients varying from l = 0.0 to l = 0.7, and the results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constraint generates a hydrostatic stress that is superimposed upon the axial stress, resulting in a three dimensional stress state. For this reason, the measured mechanical response of tested materials tends to exaggerate their real behavior [39]. Moreover, this error is more evident for thin specimens which results in high measured yield stresses [35].…”
Section: Assumption Of Split Hopkinson Pressure Barmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friction is considered to be the largest source of error in the SHPB technique [39]. During high strain rate compression tests, friction between the surfaces of the sample and the bars tends to constrain the lateral flow of the sample.…”
Section: Assumption Of Split Hopkinson Pressure Barmentioning
confidence: 99%