Flexible Query Answering Systems 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1834-5_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental CLP Platform for Integrity Constraints and Abduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As first noticed by [3], there is a clear analogy between abducibles plus integrity constraints and CHR's constraints plus rules.…”
Section: Constraint Handling Rules Chrmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As first noticed by [3], there is a clear analogy between abducibles plus integrity constraints and CHR's constraints plus rules.…”
Section: Constraint Handling Rules Chrmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The first observation of the similarity between CHR and abductive logic programming was made by [3] showing that abducible predicates can be represented as constraints in CHR's sense and integrity constraints as rules in CHR. The referenced work describes a translation of a class of abductive logic programs with limited use of negation (similar to the present paper) into CHR ∨ [4] which is an extension to CHR with disjunctions in rule bodies; the main difference is that [3] also translates the logic program component into CHR ∨ so that the efficiency of having Prolog do the resolution steps is lost.…”
Section: Conclusion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous work, such as [1], tend to use CHR as a language for abduction. However, the problem is that the user has to write two different programs for deductive and abductive reasoning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%