An experimental comparison of stand management approaches to sudden oak death: prevention vs. restoration

Abstract

Many coastal forests stretching from central California to southwest Oregon are threatened or have been impacted by the invasive forest pathogen Phytophthora ramorum, cause of sudden oak death. We analyzed a set of stand-level forest treatments aimed at preventing or mitigating disease impacts on stand composition, biomass, and fuels, using a before-after-control-intervention experiment with a revaluation after five years. We compared the effects of restorative management in invaded stands to preventative treatments in uninvaded forests. The restorative treatments contrasted two approaches to mastication, hand-crew thinning, and thinning with pile burning with untreated controls (N=30) while the preventative treatments were limited to hand-crew thinning (N=10). Half of the restoration treatments had basal sprouts removed two- and four-years after treatment. All treatments significantly reduced stand density and increased average tree size without significantly decreasing total basal area both immediately and five years after treatments. Preventative treatments also significantly increased dominance of timber species not susceptible to P. ramorum. Follow-up basal sprout removal in the restoration experiment appears to maintain treatment benefits to average tree size and may be associated with small decreases in stand density five years after initial treatment. Our study demonstrates that for at least five years, a range of common stand management practices can improve forests threatened or impacted by sudden oak death.