This study explores the ability of an interaction between need for orientation (NFO) and selective exposure to explain citizen's motivations to seek information from specific media sources and the consequences of this behavior for attribute agenda-setting effects. It draws important conceptual distinctions between the two moderate NFO categories, distinguishing active involvement NFO (high relevance and low uncertainty) from passive involvement NFO (low relevance and high uncertainty). The results suggest that in a political context, people with active involvement NFO are more likely to seek ideologically congruent media sources and more likely to adopt the media's attribute agenda. This study implies that at the second-level agenda setting, the salience of issue or object attributes on the media agenda is more likely to strengthen preexisting attitudes for people with high political interest and strong partisan identity.
INTRODUCTIONEmpirical evidence strongly supports an important role of need for orientation (NFO) as a contingent factor for agenda-setting effects. People with high relevance and high uncertainty-at the highest level of NFO-are Lindita Camaj (Ph.D., Indiana University, 2011) is an Assistant Professor at the Jack J. Valenti School of Communication at University of Houston. Her research interests include media role in democratization, agenda-setting and priming effects, the interaction between journalism and culture, and freedom of information legislation.Correspondence should be addressed to