2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nano.2011.6144474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental demonstration of the viability of energy minimizing computing using nano-magnets

Abstract: There has been recent proposals for the use of nano-magnets to directly solve quadratic minimization problems, especially those arising in computer vision applications. This is unlike proposals for using nano-magnets to represent binary states. A collection of nano-magnets, when driven to their ground states, can be seen to optimize a quadratic energy function that is determined by their relative placement. By controlling the relative placement of nano-magnets, we can change the energy function being minimized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideas of ground state computing with nanomagnets available in the literature [11][12][13][14][15][16] always presuppose an assured final relaxation of the nanomagnetic system to the ground state in order to solve a problem. This, of course, may not happen if there are deep metastable states that trap the magnetization, If and when that happens, simulated annealing will be required to reach the ground state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ideas of ground state computing with nanomagnets available in the literature [11][12][13][14][15][16] always presuppose an assured final relaxation of the nanomagnetic system to the ground state in order to solve a problem. This, of course, may not happen if there are deep metastable states that trap the magnetization, If and when that happens, simulated annealing will be required to reach the ground state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been a spurt of interest in solving challenging software tasks (image processing, computer vision, combinatorial optimization, etc) with application-specific hardware (instead of software), which does not need to execute instruction sets and hence will be much faster than software based approaches [7][8][9][10]. Some of these hardware emulators involve interacting nanomagnetic systems [11][12][13][14][15][16] because they are particularly suitable for this approach. The problem variables are mapped into the magnetic states of the interacting nanomagnets and the whole system is allowed to relax to the many-body ground state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fortunately, there are a host of non-Boolean computing applications for which magnetic devices may be eminently suitable. They include application-specific-integrated-circuits (ASICs) for image processing [16,17], simulated annealing in energy minimization computing for solving combinatorial optimization problems [18], probabilistic computing with p-bits [19][20][21][22], computer vision [23,24], Bayesian inference engines for belief networks and machine learning [25][26][27][28], restricted Boltzmann machines [29], ternary content addressable memory [30] and non-volatile and reconfigurable equality bit comparators [31] for electronic locks and hardware countermeasures against cyberattacks.…”
Section: Nanomagnetic Boolean Logic For Digital Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%