2004
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental evaluation of a loop versus a reference design for two-channel microarrays

Abstract: veronica.vinciotti@brunel.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, as there is some evidence for short-lived induction (57), the mosquitoes are held for 24 h postexposure so that any genes that are differentially expressed between groups most likely reflect constitutive rather than induced changes. An interwoven loop design, using three RNA pools from field-collected material and each colony control, was selected for between group comparisons because this experimental design is both more efficient and provides greater power compared with the standard experimental design (58). The experimental design is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as there is some evidence for short-lived induction (57), the mosquitoes are held for 24 h postexposure so that any genes that are differentially expressed between groups most likely reflect constitutive rather than induced changes. An interwoven loop design, using three RNA pools from field-collected material and each colony control, was selected for between group comparisons because this experimental design is both more efficient and provides greater power compared with the standard experimental design (58). The experimental design is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the inferred expression levels are of arbitrary unit scale, this scaling has the intuitive appeal that all gene expression level measurements are positive, as they should be. Circuit designs of microarray comparisons have been strongly endorsed by statisticians (Kerr and Churchill, 2001;Yang and Speed, 2002) and have demonstrated dramatically improved resolution with regard to identifying differential gene regulation below the twofold level (Townsend and Hartl, 2002;Vinciotti et al, 2005).…”
Section: B Experimental Design For Microarray Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only samples that yielded both high quality and a sufficient quantity of RNA were used. Instead of using a universal reference experimental design, we employed a loop experimental design (for details about this experimental design see references 17,18 ).…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%