2013
DOI: 10.7781/kjoss.2013.25.3.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Experimental Evaluation of Structural Performance for the Beam to Column Joints in Unit Modular System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure for determining the bending capacity of each joint was identical to that reported previously [17,28,31,32]. The developed joints were found to have a significantly higher lateral load-carrying capacity and seismic response than previously proposed joints [41,42]. According to previous research, semi-rigid frames with a drift ratio greater than 0.032 rad were found appropriate for use in earthquake-prone zones [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The procedure for determining the bending capacity of each joint was identical to that reported previously [17,28,31,32]. The developed joints were found to have a significantly higher lateral load-carrying capacity and seismic response than previously proposed joints [41,42]. According to previous research, semi-rigid frames with a drift ratio greater than 0.032 rad were found appropriate for use in earthquake-prone zones [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…7. The lateral load-carrying capacity showed by the joints was found comparatively better Along shorter direction of MSB Along longer direction of MSB than the joints proposed earlier [40,41]. According to the previous work done on the beam-column joints, joints with a plastic rotation angle greater than 0.032 rad were considered suitable and recommended in strong seismic zones [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In conventional modular systems, rectangular tubes or channels are generally used for the columns, and channels are used for beam members [4,5]. However, in current systems, although the specifications of connections between units can vary depending on the scope of the module interior and exterior, as well as the construction error [5], modular units are generally connected using bolts [6][7][8][9], interlocking devices [10][11][12], and steel plate welding [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%