2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-018-9595-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental examination of interbank markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all our specifications, we control for age, gender, risk aversion, and cognitive abilities. There exists experimental evidence that participants who experience more bank runs during the experiment might behave differently than those who observe fewer bank runs (see, among others, Garratt and Keister (2009), Kiss et al (2014a), Peia and Vranceanu (2019) or Davis et al (2019b)). To account for this possibility, we include a dummy variable (Observed bank run) that takes the value 1 if the subject witnessed a bank run in the previous round.…”
Section: Behavior Of Depositormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all our specifications, we control for age, gender, risk aversion, and cognitive abilities. There exists experimental evidence that participants who experience more bank runs during the experiment might behave differently than those who observe fewer bank runs (see, among others, Garratt and Keister (2009), Kiss et al (2014a), Peia and Vranceanu (2019) or Davis et al (2019b)). To account for this possibility, we include a dummy variable (Observed bank run) that takes the value 1 if the subject witnessed a bank run in the previous round.…”
Section: Behavior Of Depositormentioning
confidence: 99%