2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of the effects of workpiece and grinding parameters on minimum quantity lubrication—MQL grinding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
101
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
101
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Problematics of decreasing the thermal interactions in the cutting zone has been discussed by numerous researchers. Grinding with minimal quantity lubrication (MQL) provides efficient lubrication, reducing the grinding power and specific energy [15][16][17]. A decrease of thermal interactions in the grinding zone may be also obtained by the proper selection of processing parameters [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problematics of decreasing the thermal interactions in the cutting zone has been discussed by numerous researchers. Grinding with minimal quantity lubrication (MQL) provides efficient lubrication, reducing the grinding power and specific energy [15][16][17]. A decrease of thermal interactions in the grinding zone may be also obtained by the proper selection of processing parameters [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the surface roughness, diametric wear, grinding forces and residual stress improved when using the latter, due to optimum lubrication of the grinding zone, providing rather grain slipping at www.intechopen.com the contact zone (Silva et al, 2005;Silva et al, 2007). Brunner showed that the MQL grinding with a 4 ml/min ester oil (comparing to 11 ml/min mineral oil), when machining 16MnCr5 (SAE-5115) steel with microcrystalline aluminum oxide reduced the process normal and tangential forces to one third, however increasing the surface roughness by 50% (Tawakoli et al, 2009). Investigations by Brinksmeier confirmed these results and showed in addition that the type of coolant used during MQL grinding (ester oil or emulsion) can considerably influence the process result (Tawakoli et al, 2009).…”
Section: Mql In Grindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brunner showed that the MQL grinding with a 4 ml/min ester oil (comparing to 11 ml/min mineral oil), when machining 16MnCr5 (SAE-5115) steel with microcrystalline aluminum oxide reduced the process normal and tangential forces to one third, however increasing the surface roughness by 50% (Tawakoli et al, 2009). Investigations by Brinksmeier confirmed these results and showed in addition that the type of coolant used during MQL grinding (ester oil or emulsion) can considerably influence the process result (Tawakoli et al, 2009). Hafenbraedl and Malkin found that MQL provides efficient lubrication, reduces the grinding power and the specific energy to a level of performance comparable or superior to that obtained from conventional soluble oil (at a 5% concentration and a 5.3 l/min flow), while at the same time it significantly reduces the grinding wheel wear.…”
Section: Mql In Grindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completeness of the processed workpiece surface also deteriorates. Tawakoli et al (2009) researched the impact of grinding parameters on the workpiece surface quality in a flat grinder experiment. Compared with flood cooling wet grinding, the workpiece surface quality improves under the conditions of optimisation of grinding consumption and feed liquid parameters, with improved quality, reduced tangential grinding force, and decreased specific grinding energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%