1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00277710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An experimental investigation of the stability of converging cylindrical shock waves in air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
41
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the similarity constant α was about 0.835 for a strong cylindrical converging shock wave in air (with adiabatic exponent γ = 1.4). Later, several experiments (Matsuo & Nakamura 1980, 1981Takayama et al 1987;Baronets 1994;Hosseini & Takayama 2010;Kjellander et al 2011) were performed to determine the value of α with different incident Mach numbers and various adiabatic exponents of gases. The results indicated that the value of α was heavily dependent on the adiabatic exponent and could remain stable in a wide range of incident shock Mach numbers.…”
Section: Features Of Cylindrical Shock Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that the similarity constant α was about 0.835 for a strong cylindrical converging shock wave in air (with adiabatic exponent γ = 1.4). Later, several experiments (Matsuo & Nakamura 1980, 1981Takayama et al 1987;Baronets 1994;Hosseini & Takayama 2010;Kjellander et al 2011) were performed to determine the value of α with different incident Mach numbers and various adiabatic exponents of gases. The results indicated that the value of α was heavily dependent on the adiabatic exponent and could remain stable in a wide range of incident shock Mach numbers.…”
Section: Features Of Cylindrical Shock Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory conditions, a planar shock wave can be accurately formed in an ordinary shock tube, while a converging shock wave, especially with a controllable shape, is difficult to obtain because of its non-uniformity and variability in shape and strength. Previous experimental works on the RM instability mainly focused on the planar shock case (Brouillette 2002;Ranjan, Oakley & Bonazza 2011), with only a few exceptions (Hosseini & Takayama 2005;Luo et al 2014a;Si et al 2014b), although a great deal of effort has been taken to generate converging shock waves (Perry & Kantrowitz 1951;Takayama, Kleine & Gronig 1987;Apazidis & Lesser 1996;Hosseini, Onodera & Takayama 2000;Dimotakis & Samtaney 2006;Zhai et al 2010). It is known that the shock waves often maintain curved shapes in various applications (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although no theory and little analysis has been published on imploding toroidal waves [13], many studies have been done on cylindrical waves [14][15][16][17][18] due to the simplicity of the geometry. It is possible to imagine approximating the focal region of an imploding toroidal wave as an imploding cylindrical wave.…”
Section: Theory and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In shock focusing, a collapsing shock or detonation wave generates a high-pressure and high-temperature focal region by adiabatically compressing shocked gas as it flows into an everdecreasing area [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. This compression increases the postdetonation wave pressure higher than the Chapman-Jouguet (CJ) pressure, resulting in an increasingly overdriven detonation wave.…”
Section: Introduction Ementioning
confidence: 99%